The "club standard" CDJ. Lack of respect for controllerists. Why?

Home :: General Discussion :: The "club standard" CDJ. Lack of respect for controllerists. Why?Reply
The "club standard" CDJ. Lack of respect for controllerists. Why?
Posted on: 05.03.2013 by Toya Spor
I recently talked to a really skilled / established DJ and producer. I asked him what gear he uses, and he said CDJs. When I told him I used a controller, he laughed then apologized, saying the standard was CDJs or Technics in the clubs/gigs he played at, and that barely anyone ever uses a controller, because no one takes them seriously. He agreed that controllers were good for an introduction to DJing though.

Why do CDJs command more respect? Is it because of the lack of sync? (which isnt the case anymore because new CDJs have it, rekordbox, etc..)

Are established DJs expected to "pay their way" by buying full CDJ/DJM setups before they're given respect / gigs, even if they can produce the same quality sound with a controller?

Do controllers give off some sort of "toy" aura? To me, some of them do, but they are only intended for an introduction anyway. A controller like a Kontrol S4 seems to me like professional gear . I've heard mixes produced on S4s that sound better than guys with CDJ/DJM/Technics/pimp-ass setups.

In the end, I believe respect should be given to people who make good sounding music. But I feel like there is this "pay your way" mentality from established DJs who don't want guys with controllers to show them up if their music is better.

But I don't have the experience to know for sure. Why aren't controllerists given the same respect as a CDJ/technics user?
Julissa Serrone
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
How exactly are you supposed to accomplish that using a USB of MP3s and a pair of CDJs?

.
I believe you are limited by your creativity not the gear man.
Kathe Stump
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
This whole, "turn up to the venue with headphones and a USB stick" attitude REALLY pisses me off. It's like saying, "I'm such a rockstar I can just show up and play any old crap and people will just have to be grateful". DJing isn't just blending two tracks together like it used to be in the vinyl days (unless you were a scratch DJ), in this day and age you're expected to be actually remixing tracks live on the fly; whether you use a 4 deck setup or 2 decks and samples/effects/Maschine/Ableton/etc, you're supposed to be creating something NEW, not just playing back someone else's mixes. How exactly are you supposed to accomplish that using a USB of MP3s and a pair of CDJs?

If you're not showing up to a venue with your own gear , you're not a DJ, you're a fucking jukebox.
nobody in this entire discussion has said that people should be using CDJs as anything but HID controllers We are not telling you to use CDs or flashdrives, we are not the people you're talking about. Everyone in this discussion has advocated using modular controllers along with CDJs in HID mode. Do you not understand what HID mode is maybe?

Originally Posted by mdcdesign
Now, they're just overpriced, underspecced pieces of plastic only purchased by ignorant people and hipsters.
Yes, everyone but you is wrong and an idiot. Every multi-million-dollar club owner, huge event promoter, every talented DJ who uses CDJs, they're all total retards.

Where do you usually play again? Can we get a facebook page maybe? A soundcloud? A DJ onesheet maybe with club references? Because you sound like a bedroom DJ with no practical knowledge of the DJ scene.
Doreen Schurle
07.03.2013
This whole, "turn up to the venue with headphones and a USB stick" attitude REALLY pisses me off. It's like saying, "I'm such a rockstar I can just show up and play any old crap and people will just have to be grateful". DJing isn't just blending two tracks together like it used to be in the vinyl days (unless you were a scratch DJ), in this day and age you're expected to be actually remixing tracks live on the fly; whether you use a 4 deck setup or 2 decks and samples/effects/Maschine/Ableton/etc, you're supposed to be creating something NEW, not just playing back someone else's mixes. How exactly are you supposed to accomplish that using a USB of MP3s and a pair of CDJs?

If you're not showing up to a venue with your own gear , you're not a DJ, you're a fucking jukebox.

Originally Posted by loverocket
I have been DJing for 20+ years and I've always hated CDJ's. They don't feel anything close to an SL-1200. It is overpriced plastic garbage. And why would you put indented dimples on the side of the platters ??
Who uses those dimples? They just make you slip while pitch bending. And they still carried that crap into the CDJ-2000.
And what's with that motorized resistance feeling? Is there a motor in there??? Turn it on then. Spin like a turntable ! It's strange.

The Pioneer DDJ-SX has better feeling jogs than the CDJ-2000.

>
This. I started on Vinyl, skipped CDJs entirely, and then went to Traktor + MIDI. CDJs made sense when they were peoples' only alternative to vinyl, because it meant you had less stuff to carry to the venue. Now, they're just overpriced, underspecced pieces of plastic only purchased by ignorant people and hipsters.
Kathe Stump
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
A high price tag does not equate to high quality, and it certainly doesn't equate to high FUNCTIONALITY. To pay
Jerica Salava
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by octostout
The ignorance coming from inexperienced DJs in this thread is horrendous.

You people are actually calling CDJ2000's inferior to an S4, because they don't have cheap little pots to control your Traktor effects? Have you ever touched one? The CDJ2000 is literally the highest-quality piece of DJ gear ever mass produced, and the S4 famously has among the worst build quality, even for an all-in-one controller. T.
I have been DJing for 20+ years and I've always hated CDJ's. They don't feel anything close to an SL-1200. It is overpriced plastic garbage. And why would you put indented dimples on the side of the platters ??
Who uses those dimples? They just make you slip while pitch bending. And they still carried that crap into the CDJ-2000.
And what's with that motorized resistance feeling? Is there a motor in there??? Turn it on then. Spin like a turntable ! It's strange.

The Pioneer DDJ-SX has better feeling jogs than the CDJ-2000.

>
Rana Rigling
07.03.2013
I'm surprised that no one's picked up on one of the biggest reasons for CDJs being the club standard. Nearly all CDJs share a very basic standard layout of Play/Cue buttons on the left, jogwheel centre, pitch fader on the right, LCD up top. This standard layout allows anyone who's had even minimal experience with a CDJ to comfortably start playing at least a basic set with minimal set up time and that's what's important. Even to vinyl DJs the layout of a CDJ is instantly familiar. Club promoters and punters don't care whether you can juggle cue points whilst running multiple FX chains because that shit doesn't get people dancing. They want you in the booth ready to take over from the previous DJ in a matter of minutes. Other DJs, they don't want the hassle of having to put up with you setting up all your gear for the last half hour of their set.

Really though it shouldn't matter what the setup the club has, it shouldn't be that big a deal and you should still be able to smash it... barring things like broken/missing gear of course!

@mdcdesign - I don't know what part of the Midlands you live in but I'm up in Leicester/Nottingham/Birmingham quite regularly and I've rarely seen DJs using controllers. Most use CDJs or Traktor/Serato with CDJs in HID mode. Same in London and Bristol.
Julissa Serrone
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
If you're so knowledgeable, please tell me exactly what a CDJ does better than a controller? Because having used both, I can tell you from my experience, the answer is "fuck all".
Man, you can't see past your controllers knob, huh. It's not just the "CDJ"....it's CDJ/Turntable + Mixer STANDARD set up vs. a controller. There are soooooooo many other arguments, for example, internal mixing vs. analogue (and I MUCH prefer the sound of EQ's on a Xone or Pioneer mixer than Traktor), you keep bring up effects...hell I'd rather have the effects on a DJM and the filters on a Xone than what Traktor has, and it's not even a discussion in regards to platter control/scratching - 1200's>CDJ>Controller.

What a standard set up does is just that. It gives folks a standard to set up to play on and a controller DOES NOT offer than. You can play at any large venue with a USB and headphones.

Some folks just don't get it.

07.03.2013
Originally Posted by loverocket
I don't know what's so funny? Last time I saw Skrillex live he was using just a laptop and an M-Audio Trigger Finger:

TF_hero_L-7f04a669a1bf3036c51451c1ff024fc7.jpg

Proof that you can rock with "cheap plastic" "non-PRO" gear.

>
I wasn't trying to be funny. I've seen him use a Mixtrack...
Doreen Schurle
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by octostout
Nowhere in that entire post did I say "CDJs are better than controllers"
In fact, I VERY OBVIOUSLY advocated for the use of controllers along WITH CDJs.
My whole post was about how specifically all-in-one controllers are inferior.

What I'm actually saying is that a versatile modular setup designed to incorporate CDJs is more practical, and because of how well the modular concept lends itself to customization, it's also generally more fufilling to the DJ. I also said that CDJ2000's are of vastly higher build quality than all-in-one controllers (by a smaller margin with the DDJ-SX). Using higher-quality gear is definitely "better". I'll even give an example of a way this build quality will even affect how you sound. One way build-quality is obvious is with backspin. On a CDJ2000, you can get a really fast backspin with a long tail, because the high-end jogwheels have ball bearings, in order to send very expressive control data to traktor. The S4 has the crappiest jogwheels I've probably ever seen (I own an S4, by the way), and you can't get backspin nearly as nice out of it, no matter what you do with mapping.
You should see how a Jockey 3 or Terminal Mix 4 backspins. An S4 is NOT the standard by which all MIDI controllers should be judged. I'd also argue that certain controllers (Reloop, Vestax's high-end gear, Numark NS7, etc) are actually far better in terms of build quality than CDJs.

A high price tag does not equate to high quality, and it certainly doesn't equate to high FUNCTIONALITY. To pay
Jerica Salava
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by meatball
Skrillex uses a Mixtrack.
I don't know what's so funny? Last time I saw Skrillex live he was using just a laptop and an M-Audio Trigger Finger:

TF_hero_L-7f04a669a1bf3036c51451c1ff024fc7.jpg

Proof that you can rock with "cheap plastic" "non-PRO" gear.

>
Julissa Serrone
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by joemanton
This was a year or two ago. Maybe he has switched to other gear since then.
I'm pretty sure he didn't "gig" with the S4, only did promotion work for NI using it.....which worked perferctly for NI because folks just continued to assume that's what a big name DJ uses and post on community s as truth.

http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/...dubfire-512701
Kathe Stump
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
If you're so knowledgeable, please tell me exactly what a CDJ does better than a controller? Because having used both, I can tell you from my experience, the answer is "fuck all".
Nowhere in that entire post did I say "CDJs are better than controllers"
In fact, I VERY OBVIOUSLY advocated for the use of controllers along WITH CDJs.
My whole post was about how specifically all-in-one controllers are inferior.

What I'm actually saying is that a versatile modular setup designed to incorporate CDJs is more practical, and because of how well the modular concept lends itself to customization, it's also generally more fufilling to the DJ. I also said that CDJ2000's are of vastly higher build quality than all-in-one controllers (by a smaller margin with the DDJ-SX). Using higher-quality gear is definitely "better". I'll even give an example of a way this build quality will even affect how you sound. One way build-quality is obvious is with backspin. On a CDJ2000, you can get a really fast backspin with a long tail, because the high-end jogwheels have ball bearings, in order to send very expressive control data to traktor. The S4 has the crappiest jogwheels I've probably ever seen (I own an S4, by the way), and you can't get backspin nearly as nice out of it, no matter what you do with mapping.
Dione Haimes
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
If you're so knowledgeable, please tell me exactly what a CDJ does better than a controller? Because having used both, I can tell you from my experience, the answer is "fuck all".
plays CDs better.
backspins
Doreen Schurle
07.03.2013
Originally Posted by octostout
The ignorance coming from inexperienced DJs in this thread is horrendous.

You people are actually calling CDJ2000's inferior to an S4, because they don't have cheap little pots to control your Traktor effects? Have you ever touched one? The CDJ2000 is literally the highest-quality piece of DJ gear ever mass produced, and the S4 famously has among the worst build quality, even for an all-in-one controller. The CD2000 isn't MEANT to control traktor effects, it's meant to be a deck controller.

You're all addressing it like we're saying you should show up with CDs/thumbdrives and play on just the 2000's... No, you wankers, we're saying you should plug them into traktor as HID controllers, and bring supplemental controllers to do the things that the 2000's aren't designed to do. If you want knobs for FX control, bring a small controller with knobs, if you want cue points, bring a midi fighter, if you want a third and fourth track deck, bring Reloop Contours/ CMD PL-1's. This way you don't have reinvent the wheel, and bring in a cheap duplicate of the gear already there, just so you can use the secondary features built into it. You can easily replicate anything the S4 can do with a standard setup, and a couple of better-fitting, cheaper, higher-quality, and less intrusive controllers like Midi Fighters, Xone K2's, Behringer CMD controllers, Reloop contours, all of the korg micro controllers, etc. etc. etc.



Stop assuming that we're old traditional DJs just mixing tracks, and you're the next wave of DJ prodigies doing amazing tricks only possible with controllers... We're doing the same thing, we're just being smarter about it. We're doing exactly the same things (cue point juggling, FX combinations, sync tricks, etc.) also with controllers, we're just incorporating the gear that's already set up for our standard deck controls and mixer, because it makes more logistical sense.
If you're so knowledgeable, please tell me exactly what a CDJ does better than a controller? Because having used both, I can tell you from my experience, the answer is "fuck all".
Elvis Woodis
07.03.2013
People complain about the ignorance of newbies coming into the scene, but then I suppose they could fire it back on you and complain about your hostility?

I for one am a bit tired of the argument, and I'm sure I speak for a few people. I for one learnt to 'DJ' on CDJ's. Why? Because that's what I had access to. Now I own a controller because it takes up less space, I enjoy using Traktor, no need to burn CD's, price etc.

Also don't just assume everyone who has a controller uses 'Sync'. I use the jog wheels, and which is why I purchased the controller I did. Why does it matter what the person in the booth is using if he is mixing correctly, having fun and making people dance. Surely that's all that matters?

I'm not a fan of this just press play, but I go to see most DJ's for their productions. Although others have none, so I go to see them for their DJing ability so expect a bit more on the decks front, Jackmaster and Ben UFO for example.

Just get on with it, enjoy yourselves most of all. I would echo what is mainly said on this community , that if you do have a controller, do learn to beatmatch. If you wish, use the BPM's as a guide as 99% of clubs will have 1000's.

Let's keep the hostility (and ignorance) at the door folks.
Lannie Kutay
07.03.2013
here's the funny thing, in US, namely in Atlanta clubs where i play, you will always find cdj 2000's in every club, but the funny thing is that every dj (except big name headliners) just plugs the cdjs into traktor or serato and plays in HID. lol kinda defeats the purpose of having big fancy cdj's....
Dione Haimes
06.03.2013
Carrying a cd wallet/USB stick + headphones to a gig > carrying a controller, laptop, external hard drive, laptop stand etc etc

06.03.2013
I believe we all need to relax, take some creatine, and watch some videos Skrillex using a Mixtrack.
Elvis Woodis
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by octostout
He did not switch BACK to an S4.

So the guy you used as an example FOR the S4, actually switched away from it in favor of a setup exactly like we're describing.


The other, Porter Robinson is a kid who got famous for production and had to buy something and learn how to use it really quickly so he could start playing gigs, not having any idea what club gear was. He's also not any kind of impressive DJ... Bad example.
Woah, calm down fella.

I'm not even getting involved in this controller vs CDJ debate. I was simply pointing out that some professional producers/dj's have used, or do use an S4.

Now you look and everyone is using something different. Loco Dice uses timecoding, Zabiela ableton (and other crap, iPad etc), and some just use your standard CDJ's.
Kathe Stump
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by joemanton
This was a year or two ago. Maybe he has switched to other gear since then.
He did not switch BACK to an S4.

So the guy you used as an example FOR the S4, actually switched away from it in favor of a setup exactly like we're describing.


The other, Porter Robinson is a kid who got famous for production and had to buy something and learn how to use it really quickly so he could start playing gigs, not having any idea what club gear was. He's also not any kind of impressive DJ... Bad example.
Elvis Woodis
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by meatball
Skrillex uses a Mixtrack.
Matt Kane
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
I'm having a massive wave of D

06.03.2013
Skrillex uses a Mixtrack.
Valene Guasp
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by octostout
The ignorance coming from inexperienced DJs in this thread is horrendous.

You people are actually calling CDJ2000's inferior to an S4, because they don't have cheap little pots to control your Traktor effects? Have you ever touched one? The CDJ2000 is literally the highest-quality piece of DJ gear ever mass produced, and the S4 famously has atrocious build quality. The CD2000 isn't MEANT to control traktor effects, it's meant to be a deck controller.

You're all addressing it like we're saying you should show up with CDs/thumbdrives and play on just the 2000's... No, you wankers, we're saying you should plug them into traktor as HID controllers, and bring supplemental controllers to do the things that the 2000's aren't designed to do. If you want knobs for FX control, bring a small controller with knobs, if you want cue points, bring a midi fighter, if you want a third and fourth track deck, bring Reloop Contours/ CMD PL-1's. This way you don't have reinvent the wheel, and bring in a cheap duplicate of the gear already there, in order maintain control over traktor-specific things like FX.

Stop assuming that we're old traditional DJs just mixing tracks, and you're the next wave of DJ prodigies doing amazing tricks only possible with controllers... We're doing the same thing, we're just being smarter about it. We're doing exactlythe same things (cue point juggling, FX combinations, sync tricks, etc. )also with controllers, we're just incorporating the gear that's already set up for our standard deck controls and mixer, because it makes more logistical sense.
A lot of valid points!
Elvis Woodis
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by haze324
I thought Dubfire just did the initial commerical for the S4 before it came out. When he played at Mansion Miami last year he was on a Xone DB:4, X1, F1 and Maschine. He switched from THAT to an S4 recently?

photo of mansion:
http://www.mansionmiami.com/dev/phot...id=55&image=19
This was a year or two ago. Maybe he has switched to other gear since then.
Julissa Serrone
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by joemanton
Dubfire both play with an S4. They actually carry their S4 around with them.
I thought Dubfire just did the initial commerical for the S4 before it came out. When he played at Mansion Miami last year he was on a Xone DB:4, X1, F1 and Maschine. He switched from THAT to an S4 recently?

photo of mansion:
http://www.mansionmiami.com/dev/phot...id=55&image=19
Kathe Stump
06.03.2013
The ignorance coming from inexperienced DJs in this thread is horrendous.

You people are actually calling CDJ2000's inferior to an S4, because they don't have cheap little pots to control your Traktor effects? Have you ever touched one? The CDJ2000 is literally the highest-quality piece of DJ gear ever mass produced, and the S4 famously has among the worst build quality, even for an all-in-one controller. The CD2000 isn't MEANT to control traktor effects, it's meant to be a deck controller.

You're all addressing it like we're saying you should show up with CDs/thumbdrives and play on just the 2000's... No, you wankers, we're saying you should plug them into traktor as HID controllers, and bring supplemental controllers to do the things that the 2000's aren't designed to do. If you want knobs for FX control, bring a small controller with knobs, if you want cue points, bring a midi fighter, if you want a third and fourth track deck, bring Reloop Contours/ CMD PL-1's. This way you don't have reinvent the wheel, and bring in a cheap duplicate of the gear already there, just so you can use the secondary features built into it. You can easily replicate anything the S4 can do with a standard setup, and a couple of better-fitting, cheaper, higher-quality, and less intrusive controllers like Midi Fighters, Xone K2's, Behringer CMD controllers, Reloop contours, all of the korg micro controllers, etc. etc. etc.



Stop assuming that we're old traditional DJs just mixing tracks, and you're the next wave of DJ prodigies doing amazing tricks only possible with controllers... We're doing the same thing, we're just being smarter about it. We're doing exactly the same things (cue point juggling, FX combinations, sync tricks, etc.) also with controllers, we're just incorporating the gear that's already set up for our standard deck controls and mixer, because it makes more logistical sense.
Valene Guasp
06.03.2013
Yep Porter Robinson does I was in charge of lights and sound at the Digital Newcastle gig he done last year, Digitals booth however is huge and can accommodate 2 x 4cdj plus mixer setups
Elvis Woodis
06.03.2013
Porter Robinson and Dubfire both play with an S4. They actually carry their S4 around with them.
Jerica Salava
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by Jeff Scott
So your basically saying all clubs should get rid of cdjs and everyone should either get a controller or learn to use the controller the club has installed?
No. But clubs should be more receptive towards artists bringing in their preferred gear .

>
Valene Guasp
06.03.2013
So your basically saying all clubs should get rid of cdjs and everyone should either get a controller or learn to use the controller the club has installed?
Doreen Schurle
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by dj gullum
No need to go get the cdj2000 but why not use them if they are already in the booth at the club you play?
Because they're shit in comparison to a controller? Even the cheapest all-in-one MIDI controller will give you control over FX, hotcues, loops/beatjumping, and selectable EQ curves... A CDJ2000 gives you what... Play/Pause and track position? It's absolutely ridiculous.

A CDJ is basically a REALLY shit version of Traktor hooked up to a CD player. They were fine when they were your only alternative to turntables, but in this day and age there's really no excuse to use them.
Julissa Serrone
06.03.2013
It's amazing how many times this question comes up. It come's up because it's a reality, and folks try to explain exactly why CDJ's and Mixer are the preferred gear at clubs for a number of reasons --- and still some people try to bring up the controller argument and justify their use over and over. Gents --- got it. Alot of people use controllers, you can do some really cool stuff on them, etc. but truth remains for the majority of major clubs, CDJ's and mixer are the preferred gear .
Emerson Crist
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by narrah
The only time I feel annoyed at a dj using traktor or any other software that has sync functionality is when im not hearing something special, when its not dynamic... Im not talking about beatmashing and juggling and all that jarg, I jsut feel that if you have that tool and you've gone to the trouble of setting up your gear, you could bring a little something, something for the haters to go "hey that was cool, really difficult to get that out of a cdj"

my suggestion, even if you dont want to try cdj's, at least mix externally.... mixing internally is rubbish by comparison.
And thats why DJs with controllers arent respected. So because I own an S4, I'm obligated to put on a show with 3+ tracks at all times? I have to over use effects just so I can justify my controller? Also, since I use Traktor, does that mean that i'm using the sync button?

I play D&B, not a genre thats prone to looping for 5 minutes straight. Most of the tunes are too busy to bother with effects, and personally, I enjoy "just mixing". Even if that means actually letting the track play and doing a simple bass swap from one to another. Does that make me "just another kid" whos trying to DJ? Ive been doing this for a little over ten years and the amount of ignorance that people display against others who use controllers baffles me.

Im constantly bombarded with guys who say "Why arent you using the remix decks?" "Why arent you using 4 tracks?" or my favorite "You should use the effects more!"

CDJs were met with resistance but I dont remember it being this bad. Learn to deal with it.
Ashanti Andreacchio
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by loverocket
Plastic and fragile like the CDJ and/or any DJM Mixer?

Yes. Traktor has HID control. I am actually running out the door to spend $4000 on two CDJ-2000's so I can do less than what I could do on the $800 S4.

>
No need to go get the cdj2000 but why not use them if they are already in the booth at the club you play? I have and DDJ SX and use it sometimes when I play at a club but if they already have a set of CDJ2000 and DJM 900 I use them in Advanced HID I just bring my F1 and use it in midi mode to controll hotcue, loops and FX. only real diference between the club setup and my DDJ SX is better layout for using Traktor with my DDJ SX. I can do all the same things with the Club standard + F1 and laptop as I can do with only my Laptop and DDJ SX. Anyway in my country there is only one club that has CDJ + DJM installed at the club and most DJ's are using controllers by now.
Anyway to the CDJ DJ's looking down on controllers ... I don't realy care I get gigs and I can fill a dance floor no matter if I happen to use CDJ's or my controller. You should not be conserned about what other DJ's believe of what you use you should be more concerned about if people are dancing to what you play.
Alphonso Deitchman
06.03.2013
The DDJ-SX is a great example of a quality controller. The S4 however is not. It doesn't come close to the modern high end controllers in build quality, nevermind a proper hardware mixer. Lying about CDJs and decent mixers being fragile or costing twice their actual price really doesn't help your argument.

Pioneer gear is expensive and you're not expected to have a full club setup at home. That's why its called a club setup.
Jerica Salava
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by makar1
You do know that HID and DVS use Traktor just as much as any controller right?

If you want to show off a controller against CDJs at least pick one that's well made, not something entirely plastic and fragile like
Plastic and fragile like the CDJ and/or any DJM Mixer?

Yes. Traktor has HID control. I am actually running out the door to spend $4000 on two CDJ-2000's so I can do less than what I could do on the $800 S4.

I played around with the Pioneer DDJ-SX the other day. That feels like the future.

>
Alphonso Deitchman
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by loverocket
If I bring my laptop then I'm bringing Traktor and I'm showing these HID/DVS momo's how we do it in 2013.
You do know that HID and DVS use Traktor just as much as any controller right?

If you want to show off a controller against CDJs at least pick one that's well made, not something entirely plastic and fragile like the S4.

The X1 buttons are much nicer to press than the ones on the S4, and Maschine has much nicer pots. Jogs are awful on the S4 and the faders are mediocre.
Edwardo Rothenberger
06.03.2013
Originally Posted by narrah
No....

youve never layed hand to one, so how can you say at a pinch, a pinch away.

That's why I was asking.

I used 1210's, had a long break, and now use Traktor.

One thing I know is having a bpm counter makes it hell of a lot quicker to do your beat matching than on 1210's, even if it's not spot on, you've just then got the fine tuning to do.
Jerica Salava
06.03.2013
If I bring my laptop then I'm bringing Traktor and I'm showing these HID/DVS momo's how we do it in 2013.

CDJ's feel like the past to me. The S4 feels better to mix on.

>

<< Back to General DiscussionReply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy