Legality of the Traktor Remix decks
Legality of the Traktor Remix decks Posted on: 02.06.2012 by Johnsie Kingrea I was just believeing, how is it possible that the remix decks are legal? Anyone can throw in their own samples and export that remix track and share it with whoever. Just curious. | |
Arcelia Siebeneck 09.06.2012 | sorry to bump this thread but I believe it's an interesting topic. it seems inevitable that there's gonna be a market/demand for sharing remix sets with other Traktor users.. particularly as NI has made the process of creating and saving the remix sets so easy. So where do we draw the line, legally speaking? Are we allowed to share remix sets of copyrighted music? Probably not. But what about creating remix sets from sample clips uploaded by the artists themselves? Or what about creating remix sets from mixes that have been uploaded by the artist, label or other dj's? |
Roseanna Signorini 04.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by rdej47
|
Joesph Kasian 04.06.2012 | This topic is super random - like TS has just discovered that people can easily put samples over tracks and share them. Almost like every production program in the history of music production. And as for things like - http://mashup.mixedinkey.com/ - well....I honestly don't know how they sleep at evening ! |
Jonathan Chiuchiolo 04.06.2012 | F@#k the law, I follow my moral compass it's usually wiser that a law written by some jerk who is trying to only protect the interests of big business at the expense of... everyone else |
Romelia Stankard 04.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by rdej47
|
Sylvia Greener 04.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by rdej47
Every other way you can abuse the Remix Decks functionality is just malpractice and not intended by Native Instruments. It's like you would blame a manufacturer of kitchen knifes for giving people the tools to murder. Native Instruments' intention is to make the handling of samples as easy as the handling of songs is. |
Johnsie Kingrea 04.06.2012 | Haha I didn't start this thread out of fear. I just find it so crazy that NI has given us the ability to share our remix decks so easily with others. You could literally build an entire library of remix tracks if there was a place where people could post and share them. I guess i'm just looking at the irony of some people in the music industry who are going to try and stop sharing and downloading when we have a tool that's allowing to do this so easily. And I guess i'm just surprised that the music industry hasn't tried to stop these abilities. But again it's likely DJ's who are actually eating up the new music so why kill your target audience. |
Sylvia Greener 03.06.2012 | And ears of course, because they can listen to illegal music from downloaded files and the Remix Decks |
Marshall Aby 03.06.2012 | They should make eyes illegal because they enable us to see things and copy them. |
Yong Aptekar 03.06.2012 | ^this. You are looking at, at least, 10-15 years. So put that F1 away, put those decks and your midi fighter in the closet, and go play outside where its safe. |
Len Lukawski 03.06.2012 | it's all VERY ILLEGAL and you will all go to jail (probably in Texas) for a considerable period of time. |
Nedra Fresneda 03.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by djproben
Btw, my comment was towards sharing/selling remix packs with uncleared samples, not it's usage. |
Leeanna Ayla 03.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by djproben
|
Danae Dumler 03.06.2012 | Why would you be afraid to use samples but not be afraid to play entire songs? Elephant, meet Room. |
Brunilda Kora 03.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by kevinmcdonough"
It's ridiculous for a young aspiring DJ to be afraid of using samples because they'll run into trouble with the law. |
Classie Alvizo 03.06.2012 | hey by that rational Pro-Tools, abelton, fruity loops and all the other music production software should be illegal. But wait, so should Premier Pro, Final Cut pro and all video editing programs, cos i could just import other peoples video clips and export a new production. I can also mess about with other peoples graphics and pictures in Photoshop, so lets add that. And my printer that goes with it, I could print and share copies of stuff that doesn't belong to me, so all printers and photocopiers need to go as well. As people have said these are all tools. If you choose to do something illegal with them; photocopy books you shouldn't be, use video clips or audio clips you don't have rights to, etc etc then thats your choice and fault. k |
Brunilda Kora 03.06.2012 | I wish people would just STOP even considering the legality of sampling. Shit - a lot of us won't ever make it out of the bedroom, and even more just do it for fun. Why would you NOT use samples (which - by the way - is a ridiculous amount of fun) in your mixes/remixes? You're just depriving yourself of fun. Now go have fun sampling. If the po-leeeece ever have you in a room asking you about sampling, tell 'em Patch says it's okay. They'll know who I am... |
Nedra Fresneda 03.06.2012 | Same goes to production, don't share things you don't own the rights to. The tools are not the issue. |
Romelia Stankard 02.06.2012 |
Originally Posted by rdej47
Same reason DAWs, tape recorders, and the internet aren't illegal. |
Latrice Atcherson 02.06.2012 | As with everything in life, it's not illegal to make something, it's illegal to use it for illegal purposes. Therefore, if you make an illegal remix and sale it, it's not NI's fault, it's yours only. You agree to that when you buy and install the software.. probably somewhere in their fine print. |
<< Back to General DiscussionReply