4MidiLoop

4MidiLoop
Posted on: 31.08.2010 by Halina Gopinath
Sorry if this has been put up before but this looks great so i signed up to the newsletter and this arrived in my inbox today:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_O8qpgUfgs

they have teamed up with faderfox which means expensive?

EDIT - €1300 yikes!

MOAR EDIT - http://4midiloop.bassdas.ch/en/

(look on the tutorial page for the best picture)
Edmond Batta
26.10.2010
Originally Posted by MiL0
looks quite a lot bigger than I imagined... not a great demo video but looks a lot less crowded/busy than I first thought... shame about that price!
I actually printed out the controller onto a few sheets of paper to see how big it would actually be. Effin huge.

That video at least showed off the controller more than the previous one did.

Looks like they added different colors to it now too. You can get it in black.

Now if only it wasnt 2000 USD
Janyce Henningson
01.09.2010
Originally Posted by palaeo-tech
Opinions are like arseholes anyway.
Yeah you're right - everyone has one - and mine is that it's way overpriced for what it is and the guys at faderfox seem to have just used up what was left in their parts bin..

This was a thing of beauty - and I was believeing of buying one:

Audrey Pinda
26.10.2010
The price is too much. Wayyy too much.

Otherwise, I believe it's an interesting concept. But I still feel as though you could get away with something just as powerful (if not more) for a hell of a lot less.
Edmond Batta
26.10.2010
Originally Posted by MiL0
looks quite a lot bigger than I imagined... not a great demo video but looks a lot less crowded/busy than I first thought... shame about that price!
I actually printed out the controller onto a few sheets of paper to see how big it would actually be. Effin huge.

That video at least showed off the controller more than the previous one did.

Looks like they added different colors to it now too. You can get it in black.

Now if only it wasnt 2000 USD
Arcelia Siebeneck
26.10.2010
looks quite a lot bigger than I imagined... not a great demo video but looks a lot less crowded/busy than I first thought... shame about that price!
Hanna Ridenbaugh
26.10.2010
Hi

thought I'd post this video as have not seen it here before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8XpZFqKx8U


Graham Golie
21.09.2010
look at the new faderfox controllers... at least they are cheaper...
i like this one:
http://www.faderfox.de/mark/images/s.../dl3_front.jpg

http://soundcloud.com/luca-de-grandis/insomnia-in-ibiza-special-seamless-mix-luca-de-grandis
Graham Frazier
03.09.2010
Unless they knock atleast $500 off the price, i'm still not interested.
Hope Franzi
03.09.2010
I contacted the designers and word has it there'll be a few changes made to the design. No idea what that entails but I dare say a little cosmetic reworking may be around the corner ...
Keli Vandenbergh
02.09.2010
...

I said it to make a price comparation.

I don't like zero4 neither.


...
Hope Franzi
02.09.2010
I don't believe the Zero4 really compares though I do agree with you midifidler - it is cluttered. To me that's a result of the spacing between EQ and FX controls in the channel strips and an incidental lack of buttons. Not a practical stand alone device.

And you do make a point Nicky H. The black anodised casing of the original 4midiloop is pretty sweet and I'd like the proposed actual production model a whole lot more with that finish. I believe the additional control is welcome though and I like the believeing behind and sets the controller apart from the competition. Plenty enough room between all the knobs and faders - as for the buttons ... well that is a bit scary but I don't have sausage fingers so could probably cope.
Adolf Hit
01.09.2010
In my stinking opinion the korg zero four has exactly the same problem - way too many controls.
To make everything fit it is all squeezed together .... and I own a zero4. Has not been used in some time.
Keli Vandenbergh
01.09.2010
...

Korg Zero4 has more for less.


...
Janyce Henningson
01.09.2010
Originally Posted by palaeo-tech
Opinions are like arseholes anyway.
Yeah you're right - everyone has one - and mine is that it's way overpriced for what it is and the guys at faderfox seem to have just used up what was left in their parts bin..

This was a thing of beauty - and I was believeing of buying one:

Hope Franzi
01.09.2010
So perhaps low power consumption isn't as much of an issue but by the same token, the faders and layout are big selling points for me personally. If the aesthetic and practicality of MIDI controller design wasn't considered important and the diversity there of not respected, this whole site wouldn't exist.

At present I'm using an X1, LPD8 and MPD24 - not necessarily together - and use modifier layers to utilise an assortment of different software functions. It works well but not perfectly because the location of controls on, and intended purpose of each device doesn't 100% suit my preferred method of mixing. This on the other hand might, and I can overlook the crap silkscreening because of that. It doesn't seem busy to me either - all functions are logically grouped really.

Still, it's only conjecture on my part but I believe it's vastly better to focus on the positive as opposed to approaching it with the "guilty until proven innocent" attitude that so many seem to love.

Opinions are like arseholes anyway.
Danae Dumler
01.09.2010
Originally Posted by palaeo-tech
As for controlling the forthcoming sampler ... there's an absolute shitload of buttons on the thing. Remap!
Sure, but then you lose the specific advantage of this controller over others, which is full control over every option in a place that makes intuitive sense.
Adolf Hit
31.08.2010
1) Low power consumption -
It's a midi controller ... with virtually everything being bus powered these days this is not really significant.
2)High end faders -
Once again its a midi controller, there is no audio going through those faders, sure nice faders feel nice, but in this case its total overkill, except of course for the cross fader.
3)near 1-1 control
This just makes it cluttered - this really comes down to personal preference, but I for one like to keep it clean, this is where shift modifiers are great, as the least used functions can still be accessed but without impacting the layout and size of the more important controls.

Tbh I believe the price is pretty reasonable considering the high production cost of a small batch controller such as this - especially with a CNC alloy case. That still does not make it affordable ...
Hope Franzi
31.08.2010
As for controlling the forthcoming sampler ... there's an absolute shitload of buttons on the thing. Remap!
Hope Franzi
31.08.2010
I find it surprising that so many folks on this community don't get this controller. Though I personally prefer a more modular setup - analogue mixer, soundcard, MIDI controller - I'd strongly consider using something like this.

- low power consumption
- high end faders
- near 1 to 1 control of all parameters
- reasonable weight and footprint

Sure the design aesthetic is a little odd, but hey - if this does the job I don't give a shit. Besides, the fact that it mirrors the on-screen layout of Traktor and offers access to control without six million modifiers and shift layers is great.

The price is prohibitive but you pay for quality.
Adolf Hit
31.08.2010
FUGLY!

Kinda figured this would happen working with fader fox....

Disapointing coz the proto looked so dope, this thing is way over the top...
Keli Vandenbergh
31.08.2010
...
Originally Posted by MiL0
This thing has gone from a must-have to completely pointless in a matter of months... how disappointing.

Faderfox make brilliant, sturdy and good quality midi controllers, but they're speciality is that they're portable. The 4MidiLoop is supposed to be a 4 deck controller in a normal sized mixer case - so why did Faderfox make all the controls so stupidly small? The prototype was absolutely fine as it was!

A funny thing about the prototype... did anyone notice how a lot of the controls looked like they were taken from the Faderfox range of controllers? I guess the tie-up makes more sense now...

Oh, and anyone believeing about buying one of these - I'll make you something similar (but better) for less than 1000 euros!
Maybe is time to do it! (there is a post about it here in DJTT)


...
Arcelia Siebeneck
31.08.2010
This thing has gone from a must-have to completely pointless in a matter of months... how disappointing.

Faderfox make brilliant, sturdy and good quality midi controllers, but they're speciality is that they're portable. The 4MidiLoop is supposed to be a 4 deck controller in a normal sized mixer case - so why did Faderfox make all the controls so stupidly small? The prototype was absolutely fine as it was!

A funny thing about the prototype... did anyone notice how a lot of the controls looked like they were taken from the Faderfox range of controllers? I guess the tie-up makes more sense now...

Oh, and anyone believeing about buying one of these - I'll make you something similar (but better) for less than 1000 euros!
Danae Dumler
31.08.2010
Wow I can't believe everyone is so down on the faderfox design; to me that was a big plus given their reputation for quality. (And I actually like the look of the faderfoxes, though I agree that the buttons are a little too tiny, especially for rapid button-pushing). I believe this thing looks pretty cool myself though the price is a deal-breaker, at least until I win the lottery. And sure they could have saved space by more efficient use of buttons, but the whole point of the thing seems to be to provide detailed control over every feature. My VCI-100 uses space more efficiently, but it's a lot harder to use 4 decks and 4 effects banks when you can only see and adjust 2 and 1 at a time. Of course, the downside to such tailored hardware control is, like I wrote earlier, the software will evolve quickly and the hardware will immediately seem obsolete -- no control over the sampler and outdated loop controls.
Eldora Longchamp
01.09.2010
And that video was really really really boring..
Random X
01.09.2010
Originally Posted by Mudo
...

Protoype ported into open source has been a win, ported into Faderfox is a FAIL (imho).


...
Agrees, teaming up with Faderfox only adds up to one thing, expensive commercial marketing.
Graham Frazier
01.09.2010
Originally Posted by Abyrne7
Wow that makes no sence to me, no audio on a big rig like that one.

It seems like its almost TOO much control over every little detail in traktor. They should have gave up some control over things you would probally never use and just create larger buttons for cue juggling etc.
There is no such thing as too much control, but tiny buttons suck.
Leeanna Ayla
31.08.2010
Your a little late

http://www.djranking s.com/community /showthread.php?t=17554
Mac Fly
31.08.2010
Wow that makes no sence to me, no audio on a big rig like that one.

It seems like its almost TOO much control over every little detail in traktor. They should have gave up some control over things you would probally never use and just create larger buttons for cue juggling etc.
Elton Rackley
31.08.2010
I really thought this would be in the $500 price range but $1600 !!!! come on its still just a 4 channel midi controller with buttons and led feedback but WITHOUT an audio interface. maybe with audio the price could be justified but without, it doesn't stand a chance.
Halina Gopinath
31.08.2010
I was a fan of the original design and i actually kind of like the way everything is in one box. One of these, 2 x 1200s and a Midi Fighter would be perfect for me i believe but the price?!?!?! What were they believeing...
Dorcas Bassignani
31.08.2010
Originally Posted by MonkeyFish
Sorry if this has been put up before but this looks great so i signed up to the newsletter and this arrived in my inbox today:
after this i expected to see.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVD_Lvv4UOI




and now i've finished fucking around;

FaderFox have ruined it!! Yeah it's fair enough they sold the concept to a company to mass produce, but it didn't have to get the same shitty styling. In fact FF could've used this to launch a new look.
I like the fact that it has a button for everything, but i can see that as also a huge weakness, not sure why as yet, but something feels wrong about it.
It might be because the buttons aren't going to be a decent size for a few things, like cue juggles, you won't be able to do that so easily on this.

no comment on the price
Graham Frazier
31.08.2010
I had such high hopes for this. But now....ugh.
Still would like to get my hands on one, just to see how it feels to work with.
Dorcas Bassignani
31.08.2010
THIS THING IS...
Danae Dumler
31.08.2010
http://www.4midiloop.com/en/home/

Looks pretty cool, too, though the youtube video just shows the guy scratching with it rather than pushing any buttons. Big news is it was made in collaboration with Faderfox, so you know you're getting quality parts and materials. I've never seen this much control over all four effects banks, and there's even a 4-band EQ!

The bad news is the price -- 1300 euros -- that's a shitload of American dollars -- for a midi controller with no sound card. The other thing that would worry me about buying this is that it's optimized for Traktor Pro 1.2.4 .... so it's likely to feel pretty dated in a few months when the Traktor update comes out. There's no sampler buttons or controls, and the loop controls will probably feel obsolete when the new loop browser is available in Traktor. And a minor nitpick, the brushed aluminum look is cool but I preferred the black prototype. Still, it's a pretty nice looking piece of kit and I would definitely get one if I were made of money....
Irwin Ney
31.08.2010
It's ugly and overpriced
Keli Vandenbergh
31.08.2010
...

Protoype ported into open source has been a win, ported into Faderfox is a FAIL (imho).


...
Maybell Corb
31.08.2010
Oh yeah, and the styling looks horrid - always thought Faderfox stuff looked really ugly. Such a shame, I did believe it might be the controller of my dreams!
Maybell Corb
31.08.2010
What a shame, I'd been waiting for news on this controller ever since the first Youtube clip appeared but now the details are out, it looks ridiculously overpriced compared to the S4. The control layout isn't particularly "clever" in my opinion either - too many buttons and too busy, they seem to have just mapped every available Traktor control to a button/knob without believeing about ways to make better use of space or to do something a bit innovative - e.g. the S4's loop length knob/display.

The S4 isn't perfect by any means either, but it's more interesting than this.

I'm still not totally sold on the idea of one huge integrated controller though - all well and good if you only use it in your studio, but once you start playing out in clubs, it's going to be tricky unless something (e.g. the S4) becomes an industry standard (which I can't imagine it will - it's a bit too toy-like in the photos), most places I've played at have struggled to fit in a laptop and a BCR2000, never mind something 50x30cm. I'm still more interested in doing interesting things with smaller controllers and e.g. my (not spent enough time with it as a controller to figure out how big a loss the lack of tactile controls is, but I can believe of some pretty interesting layouts, and as long as you have a proper mixer/MIDI controller for volume and EQ, I believe it might be OK).

Rant over
Mac Fly
31.08.2010
Heres a pic
Janyce Henningson
31.08.2010
Yeah the prototype looked well nice but I don't like this version - and it's totally overpriced in my opinion.

<< Back to Reviews of DJ equipment Reply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy