Xone 42 vs Pioneer DJM700
Xone 42 vs Pioneer DJM700 Posted on: 06.09.2011 by Hipolito Scionti After moving from vinyl and serato to VCI SE (which I still love) I've decided I just love mixing on decks and so I'm gonna get TSP2 (audio 10) but I want a new mixer too.My budget is around | |
| Deanne Limes 06.09.2011 | as said by other before if you intend to use the mixer along with traktor xone 42 for the better sound quality, if you'll use it with cdjs/turntables then go for the djm :P |
| Paulette Stolhand 06.09.2011 | If you believe you will make use of the filters in the style that you mix then defo go for the 42 |
| Alla Bluemke 06.09.2011 | I've got 700 and all I can say is I really love it. I like having the echo, delay, flanger, phaser effects. The filter is no Xone filter but it definitely does the job. Additionally xone eqs are total kill. Pios are not really. But the layout quality and effects made me really love it for home mixing. |
| Laurence Ostgaard 06.09.2011 | xone 42 all the way... especially if u can utilize traktors effects... more headroom and better sound on the 42 imo |
| Rebbecca Fennell 06.09.2011 | me personally - i would go for the 42 and a kaoss pad. |
| Hipolito Scionti 06.09.2011 |
Originally Posted by tyfurious
I do like the mixer FX on my DJM600 cause they are post fader... |
| Leeanna Ayla 06.09.2011 | I believe I would go with the 42. |
| Joy Rory 06.09.2011 | Do you want FX, and something that looks and works alot like the (new) standard club mixer ? -> DJM 700 You dont really need the FX, you just want a good mixer, with good sound quality (not sayin the 700's bad) -> 42 |
| Corrin Penney 06.09.2011 | Xone 42 in graphite better looking, better build, better sound, great filters although no effects. Not that you'll care with traktor though. |
| Gilma Marchini 06.09.2011 | Pioneer DJM700 More effects and the chance is that you'll see more of them if you ever play out (depending on your style and location too though). I believe the 42 is a better mixer though. |
<< Back to General DiscussionReply