Multi-core support Traktor?
Multi-core support Traktor? Posted on: 21.10.2012 by Rosita Jesch Is enabling multi-core support a good thing or a bad thing on a macbook pro?I'm new to digital djing and not sure if this is a good thing and couldnt find too much about it... Thanks! Fores | |
| Rosita Jesch 21.10.2012 | Is enabling multi-core support a good thing or a bad thing on a macbook pro? I'm new to digital djing and not sure if this is a good thing and couldnt find too much about it... Thanks! Fores |
| Trista Karle 07.11.2012 | For track analyzing its fairly slow even on a powerful system my x3100 oc at 3.6 does it as quickly as my quad core desktop at 2.9ghz |
| Lina Rawie 07.11.2012 | It doesn't seem to do anything. When you analyse tracks, it still only uses 1 core/thread so it only does 1 track at a time. When Traktor is in use for DJing, it's only using 1 core/thread as you can see in Task Manager. Traktor isn't very well optimised for powerful hardware. My PC has a CPU with 8 cores, each running at 3.5 GHz, and I can encode 8 tracks at once with dBpoweramp really quickly, so there's no excuse for Traktor only being able to analyse 1 track at a time. Serato will analyse 1 track per core/thread, for instance. |
| Venetta Cawyer 07.11.2012 | Is there any word on this? I just set Traktor to analyze 80 tracks (Traktor 2.6 on Windows 8 Pro 64bit) and it's only utilizing one core on my Q6600.. Can anyone else check this on their Windows/Mac? |
| Arline Receveur 21.10.2012 | Good Thing. Just allows you to utilize all the core's from your CPU. |
| Nedra Fresneda 21.10.2012 | It was a bit of a hit and miss thing as soon as it dropped but it's rock solid for most people now (for the record, I never had issues with it). |
| Tatum Ansaldo 21.10.2012 | Yes it's a good thing. |
<< Back to General DiscussionReply