Plugins. Thinking Waves. Help.
Plugins. Thinking Waves. Help. Posted on: 20.12.2011 by Jovita Schulist YOYO,produce heavy dubstep, looking to get signed soon. Been using fm8, massive, absynth, and sylenth and the stock ableton eq's,reverbs, etc. NEED : EQ Maximizer Reverb Compression Phatness ( I have sausage fattener but is there a better one? ) Limiter Widener I believe thats about it? Suggestions? Waves Vs. UAD ? Hit me back. Thanks. Jed | |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Jovita Schulist 20.12.2011 | YOYO, produce heavy dubstep, looking to get signed soon. Been using fm8, massive, absynth, and sylenth and the stock ableton eq's,reverbs, etc. NEED : EQ Maximizer Reverb Compression Phatness ( I have sausage fattener but is there a better one? ) Limiter Widener I believe thats about it? Suggestions? Waves Vs. UAD ? Hit me back. Thanks. Jed |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | He's had more experience than I have, and he's actually paid for his stuff instead of just using it haphazardly. |
Monserrate Rupnow 21.12.2011 | UAD definitely, though either way there's a lot better sounding options for cheaper than Waves. Check out some of the stuff from DMGAudio.com, or Fabfilter. Most have free demos so you can try for yourself. |
Dorie Scelzo 21.12.2011 | What's your budget? If you're considering Waves and UAD, it's probably substantial. In your situation (and assuming you're going to stick with Ableton), I'd be seriously tempted to use UAD just because of the DSP box. Some of the vintage modeling stuff uses resources very quickly. Their selection is a bit smaller and there's the initial cost of the DSP |
Arletha Heddens 20.12.2011 | Perhaps try the production sub-community ? |
Jovita Schulist 20.12.2011 | NOBODY?! c'mon guys. |
<< Back to Producer tips and DAW informationReply