Which DAW is right for me?

Home :: Producer tips and DAW information :: Which DAW is right for me?Reply
Which DAW is right for me?
Posted on: 19.02.2013 by Christiana Ercolani
Hey guys -

So I'm looking to producing my own house music. For the longest time, I've produced hip-hop using a hybrid set up of FL Studio and ACID Pro. But the versions I have are pretty dated so I'm looking to either update FL Studio, or maybe try something else.

So far, Ableton and Maschine seem to be the front-runners. But for anyone here who has experience with both, can you summarize what each system is better catered to? The tactile immediacy of Maschine seems to jump out at me, but is it at all limited as far as production goes, as I imagine it's sacrificing something to be a production/performance hybrid?

What makes Ableton the industry-standard (or it at least seems like it is) for dance music?

And of course, I plan on downloading the demos to try them out myself, but I'm at work right now and I figured I would pick you guys' brains in the meantime.
Dorie Scelzo
21.02.2013
Originally Posted by ???
Live, for instance is made by a german company that doesn't seem concerned with country music, for which many of its features would not be exceptionally useful. It also isn't made for performance with specific audio products, like Pro Tools.
That's not entirely true. It does make more concessions so that you can use it more fluidly live. Dummy clips that don't contain audio but contain information to control plugins has been used in live FOH contexts by
Dorie Scelzo
19.02.2013
With very few caveats, it's not the DAW that makes the music. Some are better than others at specific things, some lack specific things
Dorie Scelzo
21.02.2013
Originally Posted by ???
Live, for instance is made by a german company that doesn't seem concerned with country music, for which many of its features would not be exceptionally useful. It also isn't made for performance with specific audio products, like Pro Tools.
That's not entirely true. It does make more concessions so that you can use it more fluidly live. Dummy clips that don't contain audio but contain information to control plugins has been used in live FOH contexts by
Rosaline Delahoya
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
You seem like so much fun!



I disagree strongly - these products are largely made with specific use cases in mind. Live, for instance is made by a german company that doesn't seem concerned with country music, for which many of its features would not be exceptionally useful. It also isn't made for performance with specific audio products, like Pro Tools.

It's certainly possible to make good music with ill-suited gear , but not advisable.
This is what plug-ins and VST's are for.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - DAWs do all sorts of things, like multi-tracking, VST hosting, arrangement, etc.
counts as workflow.


Originally Posted by botstein
I disagree strongly - For many, Live isn't 'about creating the song' at all but a live performance instrument, as you go on to say:
So, you have a bunch of controllers, yet, you never played a part of any song you've created using them? That's a first.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - I believe that its design centered around live performance, warping, or creative possibilities with Max have something to do with why it's favoured by many. I do love controllers, though.
controllers which allow LIVE PERFORMANCE. Try doing live performances with FL Studio before FL they introduced performance mode.

Originally Posted by botstein
I disagree strongly - I know many people that use Live without controllers for everything from film scoring to remixes and love it.
He is asking about music. And if you aren't going to be using controllers, using other DAW's are a lot better (like you said before about using ill-suited gear ). Why do you believe Ableton comes out with bundles of controllers? Even they know this.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - big features, like warping, make the difference for me.
You can warp in ANY DAW. It's just called differently. They all have differences in how it's done. Therefore the "little things".


Most of the things you've stated here are you disagreeing, but then saying the same thing.
Ervin Calvery
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by mostapha
With very few caveats, it's not the DAW that makes the music. Some are better than others at specific things, some lack specific things…but you can do it with just about any of them.

The only way to make the right decision is to just try them. Work through some tutorials (during trial periods) and make some music…move on to the next one……and go back at some point. Something will jive with the way you believe…it won't be completely fluid until you really learn something, but that will give you a lot better of an idea what working with them is like than a bunch of people probably recommending what they use or what they want to use.

Failing that, watch a lot of tutorial videos (avoid review videos). And pick what seems to make the most sense.

Ableton is popular because it's somewhat groove/clip based, so it's easier to sketch in than a lot of others, it's fairly straightforward, and it gets a lot of more technical things right. Also, its MIDI effects are the best and most straightforward I've seen. But that doesn't necessarily make it the best tool.

IMvhO:

  • Maschine has the most groovebox-like interface.
  • Pro Tools is the best all-around for editing and mixing audio, and it can do everything else, though some of it is convoluted.
  • Logic is probably the most cost-effective (if you own a mac or have the hardware for a hackintosh) but parts of it are convoluted.
  • Reason has a very interesting interface and the best meters I've seen, but its sequencer is god-awful.
  • Cubase/Studio One/Nuendo are just weird interfaces that I never got the hang of.
  • Ableton might be the most straight-forward, but it does a few things differently from everything else.
  • Trackers like Renoise are very interesting…and they're really fast if you know where you want to go and are very familiar with them…but they're weird for experimentation and they just don't have as much thought put into how you interact with different parts of it.


I've been using Maschine + Pro Tools for a while, and I really enjoy it. But the Push has me considering a switch. It seems like it would get past some of Maschine's shortcomings as well as some of the stuff NI likes to do that I really don't like (like level meters that either don't exist or don't mean anything), but I'd still route the audio it into Pro Tools because I just like it better for mixing than anything else I've tried.
Mos - this is a very nice post.
Dorie Scelzo
19.02.2013
With very few caveats, it's not the DAW that makes the music. Some are better than others at specific things, some lack specific things
Rosaline Delahoya
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree.
Without an explanation on why you disagree, it's rather hard to understand this as anymore than being a fanboy.
Berta Baie
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by elmgroove
What makes Ableton the industry-standard (or it at least seems like it is) for dance music?
You know its really not, from most of the videos i've seen of top house producers almost every single one of them uses Logic it seems. Which makes sense because its so much more intuitive to use imo.
Ervin Calvery
20.02.2013
Originally Posted by padi_04
Yup. But enjoy the 30 day demo before buying it
+1
Ervin Calvery
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by elmgroove
Damn I was hoping you wouldn't say that! Do you mind giving me a quick glimpse on what your workflow is like using both systems?
With the Maschine VST it's possible to just route each group to separate outs:
http://community .djranking s.com/showthread.php?t=48092

One can drag and drop audio and MIDI to and from Maschine and Ableton.

The remote script for Maschine mk2 in Ableton is incredimazing, too.
Christiana Ercolani
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
Ableton and Maschine together is the way to go.
Damn I was hoping you wouldn't say that! Do you mind giving me a quick glimpse on what your workflow is like using both systems?
Christiana Ercolani
19.02.2013
Hey guys -

So I'm looking to producing my own house music. For the longest time, I've produced hip-hop using a hybrid set up of FL Studio and ACID Pro. But the versions I have are pretty dated so I'm looking to either update FL Studio, or maybe try something else.

So far, Ableton and Maschine seem to be the front-runners. But for anyone here who has experience with both, can you summarize what each system is better catered to? The tactile immediacy of Maschine seems to jump out at me, but is it at all limited as far as production goes, as I imagine it's sacrificing something to be a production/performance hybrid?

What makes Ableton the industry-standard (or it at least seems like it is) for dance music?

And of course, I plan on downloading the demos to try them out myself, but I'm at work right now and I figured I would pick you guys' brains in the meantime.
Drew Zamzow
12.03.2013
I vote Ableton + maschine hands down, The work flow on this setup up is great, if your using Maschine as a controller for live. Both products have such a huge community surrounding them it was an easy choice for me. I find that these communities are great support networks for when you run into speed bumps, though Im not as firmiliar with FL , Logic, Protools... Ableton has incredible Midi mapping capabilitys I just found it to be the most fun to use, I also really enjoy the concept of performace view vs arrangement view.
Sydney Lashway
21.02.2013
Q elmgroove: yeah man, you've got to find something you like. I personally did not like Ableton when using the 30 day trial. It could be I'm just set in my stubborn ways. That being said, stick with what you like. Even being a Maschine guy, the Push/Ableton combo looks pretty sweet. Also, being a piano player, I'd rather just MIDI out my Maschine to small key controller. I still can't used to playing melodies on pads. I will say however, they seemed to put a lot of thought into Push with respect to that.
Christiana Ercolani
21.02.2013
@BiggChev: Yeah, I've found that lately I'm a big fan of a streamlined workflow and being able to pick something up and just start laying out ideas is a big plus in my book. That's why the Maschine/Push type of setting I believe will work for me.
Christiana Ercolani
21.02.2013
I've been looking at a lot of the tutorials and I'm currently leaning toward Ableton, and with Push coming out soon, that sweetens the deal even more. Still playing with demos, though.

But I have a quick technical question... I currently have Traktor Pro with an S2. No matter what DAW I end up going with, can I leverage the S2's internal sound card when using my DAW? Or would it make sense to get a separate one? And if I can use the S2's sound card, does that mean Traktor Pro would have to be running to use it? Or as long as the S2 is on and connected, my computer (Macbook, FYI) will recognize it?

Thanks again guys.
Sydney Lashway
20.02.2013
I started with FL + Acid then moved onto an Acid + Cubase setup.

I've used Pro Tools before, but Cubase is till my favourite DAW. It is VERY involved and can do quite a bit. Audio editing on Pro Tools I find is better, but supposedly the latest Cubase version has come a long way from what it was before. As for MIDI/VSTs Cubase is great. As I don't have either of my preferred DAWs right now I'm been contemplating spending the $$$ to get the latest Cubase or going with Logic Pro.

Now, Maschine...to me is really quite amazing. IT does take a bit of getting used to but I find workflow wise it's great. I'm not staring at a comp screen, and mousing around clicking things. When hosted in something like Pro Tools or Cubase it definitely has the potential to be the centre of your set up. Right now I'm working solely in Maschine. It makes for a logical replacement to FL and Acid. You've got patterns and VST capabilities of FL and the chopping sampling of Acid.
Dorie Scelzo
21.02.2013
Originally Posted by ???
Live, for instance is made by a german company that doesn't seem concerned with country music, for which many of its features would not be exceptionally useful. It also isn't made for performance with specific audio products, like Pro Tools.
That's not entirely true. It does make more concessions so that you can use it more fluidly live. Dummy clips that don't contain audio but contain information to control plugins has been used in live FOH contexts by
Rosaline Delahoya
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
You seem like so much fun!



I disagree strongly - these products are largely made with specific use cases in mind. Live, for instance is made by a german company that doesn't seem concerned with country music, for which many of its features would not be exceptionally useful. It also isn't made for performance with specific audio products, like Pro Tools.

It's certainly possible to make good music with ill-suited gear , but not advisable.
This is what plug-ins and VST's are for.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - DAWs do all sorts of things, like multi-tracking, VST hosting, arrangement, etc.
counts as workflow.


Originally Posted by botstein
I disagree strongly - For many, Live isn't 'about creating the song' at all but a live performance instrument, as you go on to say:
So, you have a bunch of controllers, yet, you never played a part of any song you've created using them? That's a first.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - I believe that its design centered around live performance, warping, or creative possibilities with Max have something to do with why it's favoured by many. I do love controllers, though.
controllers which allow LIVE PERFORMANCE. Try doing live performances with FL Studio before FL they introduced performance mode.

Originally Posted by botstein
I disagree strongly - I know many people that use Live without controllers for everything from film scoring to remixes and love it.
He is asking about music. And if you aren't going to be using controllers, using other DAW's are a lot better (like you said before about using ill-suited gear ). Why do you believe Ableton comes out with bundles of controllers? Even they know this.

Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree - big features, like warping, make the difference for me.
You can warp in ANY DAW. It's just called differently. They all have differences in how it's done. Therefore the "little things".


Most of the things you've stated here are you disagreeing, but then saying the same thing.
Christiana Ercolani
19.02.2013
Agreed. Thanks for the write-up.
Ervin Calvery
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by mostapha
With very few caveats, it's not the DAW that makes the music. Some are better than others at specific things, some lack specific things…but you can do it with just about any of them.

The only way to make the right decision is to just try them. Work through some tutorials (during trial periods) and make some music…move on to the next one……and go back at some point. Something will jive with the way you believe…it won't be completely fluid until you really learn something, but that will give you a lot better of an idea what working with them is like than a bunch of people probably recommending what they use or what they want to use.

Failing that, watch a lot of tutorial videos (avoid review videos). And pick what seems to make the most sense.

Ableton is popular because it's somewhat groove/clip based, so it's easier to sketch in than a lot of others, it's fairly straightforward, and it gets a lot of more technical things right. Also, its MIDI effects are the best and most straightforward I've seen. But that doesn't necessarily make it the best tool.

IMvhO:

  • Maschine has the most groovebox-like interface.
  • Pro Tools is the best all-around for editing and mixing audio, and it can do everything else, though some of it is convoluted.
  • Logic is probably the most cost-effective (if you own a mac or have the hardware for a hackintosh) but parts of it are convoluted.
  • Reason has a very interesting interface and the best meters I've seen, but its sequencer is god-awful.
  • Cubase/Studio One/Nuendo are just weird interfaces that I never got the hang of.
  • Ableton might be the most straight-forward, but it does a few things differently from everything else.
  • Trackers like Renoise are very interesting…and they're really fast if you know where you want to go and are very familiar with them…but they're weird for experimentation and they just don't have as much thought put into how you interact with different parts of it.


I've been using Maschine + Pro Tools for a while, and I really enjoy it. But the Push has me considering a switch. It seems like it would get past some of Maschine's shortcomings as well as some of the stuff NI likes to do that I really don't like (like level meters that either don't exist or don't mean anything), but I'd still route the audio it into Pro Tools because I just like it better for mixing than anything else I've tried.
Mos - this is a very nice post.
Dorie Scelzo
19.02.2013
With very few caveats, it's not the DAW that makes the music. Some are better than others at specific things, some lack specific things
Rosaline Delahoya
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
I strongly disagree.
Without an explanation on why you disagree, it's rather hard to understand this as anymore than being a fanboy.
Berta Baie
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by elmgroove
What makes Ableton the industry-standard (or it at least seems like it is) for dance music?
You know its really not, from most of the videos i've seen of top house producers almost every single one of them uses Logic it seems. Which makes sense because its so much more intuitive to use imo.
Ervin Calvery
20.02.2013
Originally Posted by padi_04
Yup. But enjoy the 30 day demo before buying it
+1
Nedra Fresneda
19.02.2013
Yup. But enjoy the 30 day demo before buying it
Christiana Ercolani
19.02.2013
A lot of good stuff here. So because I don't have a grand laying around lol, would it make sense to start with Ableton and learn that inside and out, and then, if it comes to it, add Maschine (or potentially Push) later on?
Ervin Calvery
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by elmgroove
Damn I was hoping you wouldn't say that! Do you mind giving me a quick glimpse on what your workflow is like using both systems?
With the Maschine VST it's possible to just route each group to separate outs:
http://community .djranking s.com/showthread.php?t=48092

One can drag and drop audio and MIDI to and from Maschine and Ableton.

The remote script for Maschine mk2 in Ableton is incredimazing, too.
Rosaline Delahoya
19.02.2013
tbh, there really isn't a specific DAW for types of music. The only thing DAW's do is change your workflow and how you go about creating the song. The reason why Ableton is the industry standard, is controllers. Without controllers, you're gonna have a real bad time using it. Also, ableton is usually used more for live performances among producers. There's quite a few that just use FL, Logic, Reason, Cubase, etc.... If you like to perform your music though, Ableton is the way to go. If you like clicking in midi notes and such, ableton CAN do that, but it's a rather annoying process. It's the little things that make a difference in being comfortable while making music.
Nedra Fresneda
19.02.2013
I would wait for Push to be released before and have some proper reviews before buying Maschine. I Ableton+Maschine as well. The hands on experience is pretty good to get you in the workflow and by having Maschine loaded inside Ableton and routed accordingly you have the best of both worlds.
Christiana Ercolani
19.02.2013
Originally Posted by botstein
Ableton and Maschine together is the way to go.
Damn I was hoping you wouldn't say that! Do you mind giving me a quick glimpse on what your workflow is like using both systems?

<< Back to Producer tips and DAW informationReply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy