DB4 - cdj input + VU meters

Home :: Reviews of DJ equipment :: DB4 - cdj input + VU metersReply
DB4 - cdj input + VU meters
Posted on: 05.11.2011 by Cliff Lohman
Hi,

So I got my DB4 yesterday and been loving it for last 24 hours..

I noticed something weird about the VU meters tho.. it seems like line inputs (cdj900 in particular) kick ALOT of volume into the db4 and there seems to be no way to trim such that the VU meters dont clip all the time. Yes, you can assign a trim to the MIX setting but it doesnt appear to impact the VU meters.

If I play a track on cdj900 and I turn db4 trim knob ALL the way to the lowest point, the VU meter is still well above the 0 mark on the channel meter. So I then go to the MIX menu settings and apply a trim and you can hear an audible decrease but the VU meters stay the same. Point being that channels look like they are clipping when they really shouldnt be.

Any workaround for this? Anybody else notice this issue?

Thnx
Kevin
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by djproben
If there's an easy way to "map" the K2 to the DB4 functions the way you can map MIDI, the possibilities are endless! It would be great to be able to change various effect parameters or to pre-program a specific effect combo and setting to a button the way you can with traktor midi mapping. I wonder what mapping would look like for that though; is it something we'll be able to do on a computer screen somehow?

Even more interesting, if this kind of mapping is possible, would it be possible to respond to MIDI signals from another controller? Maybe that's pushing it but it would be really cool to control DB4 functions from a MIDIfighter....

I really like the rotary mixer option idea but not just for the volume knobs ... I actually really like the idea of using the channel faders as D/W knobs. One thing I really loved about the Ecler Evo 5 is the D/W crossfader which allows you to insert momentary effects and cut them off quickly on beat. I'm currently doing this using the effects on/off buttons and having the D/W knob turned up, but those buttons are a bit too stiff and clicky for that purpose.
Interesting thought.. keeping a ton of effect pre-sets would be sweet.. Or if u could start to do like super knob type stuff with multiple effects. It'll definitely be interesting to see whats in store with the link feature
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by ToS
When switching between EQ-knob modes, can't you just hold the button of the mode you are switching to and, while holding it down, tune the knobs to the desired position without the change in sound?
No because its a little silver switch (like the little pilot cockpit switches if u know wat i mean). so u have to flip the switch.

Its not like the efx latching buttons where u can hold it down to not engage it. Of course, u can do that with the 2 seperate filters on the bottom (but not the filter by the iso/eq section).
Romelia Stankard
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
one thing i forgot to mention, is that with 4 tracks running at the same time, you're up against a lot of information and a horrible amount of sonic density. working with the filter eq allows for precise subtractive filtering, or graceful boosts to just the sections you need. as such, you can fit multiple tunes together in a way that they don't compete against each other. it also lends itself to very effective swapping of bass lines or percussion parts, etc... just honing the techniques of resonance and filter freq relationships.

"sculpting" is the word i always gravitate toward; it's quite literal too - the individual tracks are like big pieces of stone that you can whittle down, smooth out, and shape to just the essentials via the filter mode eq, with the end result being a flowing composition of marble, granite, amethyst, and fossilized dinosaur poops.

all of these fx suggestions are being meditated on and quite possible, it's just establishing priority and development resources to make it an actual reality. a product like K2 connected via xlink has potential for expanding control beyond the existing interface for such things.

as a side note, you can run effects into effects in a production context - using the pfl sends via the usb menu, you could configure ableton live to stack ch's 1-3 into 4 as your main output.

and to further dive into a production tangent, it's completely ridiculous and fun to use the DB4 as an effects processor for tracking. i have mine connected via spdif to my apogee ensemble, routed via an aux send in live, then play the DB4's effects over a drum buss via matrixed inputs. ch 1 is a hall reverb, ch 2 is a plate reverb that i only bring up on the 2 (first snare hit), then a emt250 on the 4 (second snare hit) and ch 4 for some other silly effect to bring in and out. from there i do finger sequencing, and play the effects with the track. i get tripped up a lot, but the mistakes add to the character of everything. totally worth giving it a try, as vst reverbs can't hold a candle to what's happening with dr rob's amazing reverb designs...
Man the possibilities here are crazy.

I sent in a firmware request ticket to A&H to make a firmware rotary mixer option that would swap the D/W knob on each channel with the linear fader, so the line fader becomes D/W and the big D/W knob becomes volume, do you believe this would be possible at some point?
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
one thing i forgot to mention, is that with 4 tracks running at the same time, you're up against a lot of information and a horrible amount of sonic density. working with the filter eq allows for precise subtractive filtering, or graceful boosts to just the sections you need. as such, you can fit multiple tunes together in a way that they don't compete against each other. it also lends itself to very effective swapping of bass lines or percussion parts, etc... just honing the techniques of resonance and filter freq relationships.

"sculpting" is the word i always gravitate toward; it's quite literal too - the individual tracks are like big pieces of stone that you can whittle down, smooth out, and shape to just the essentials via the filter mode eq, with the end result being a flowing composition of marble, granite, amethyst, and fossilized dinosaur poops.

all of these fx suggestions are being meditated on and quite possible, it's just establishing priority and development resources to make it an actual reality. a product like K2 connected via xlink has potential for expanding control beyond the existing interface for such things.

as a side note, you can run effects into effects in a production context - using the pfl sends via the usb menu, you could configure ableton live to stack ch's 1-3 into 4 as your main output.

and to further dive into a production tangent, it's completely ridiculous and fun to use the DB4 as an effects processor for tracking. i have mine connected via spdif to my apogee ensemble, routed via an aux send in live, then play the DB4's effects over a drum buss via matrixed inputs. ch 1 is a hall reverb, ch 2 is a plate reverb that i only bring up on the 2 (first snare hit), then a emt250 on the 4 (second snare hit) and ch 4 for some other silly effect to bring in and out. from there i do finger sequencing, and play the effects with the track. i get tripped up a lot, but the mistakes add to the character of everything. totally worth giving it a try, as vst reverbs can't hold a candle to what's happening with dr rob's amazing reverb designs...
Thnx as always for ur encouraging tips..

Im curious as to an example of what the k2 might expand tho? I figured itd be nice and easy way to control more traktor midi functions (like the x1) but i wasnt believeing of it expanding db4 functions. Even if its a completely made up example - can u give one? Would it do something like - allow more efx paramter controls? Or give u more channels?
Cliff Lohman
22.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
i only use filter mode and never touch the iso or eq unless i'm getting out of them.

filter mode is where the real magic of the mixer happens, it's just a different way of working from fixed frequency shelving filters, and the reward you get from learning how the resonance interacts with HPF/LPF results in amazingly coherent sculptures from multiple sources.

the offset of resonance is for ergonomic reasons. it allows easier access to either of the filter frequencies and resonance at the same time. it's important to work the resonance to get the most out of the filter mode itself.

at maximum resonance - it creates boost (quite a lot at times) relative to the filter frequencies... at minimum resonance it cuts, as the slope rolls off quite a bit. the idea is that you can use the filters to isolate the part of a track you want to emphasize, and how magnified or zoomed out you'll be is a byproduct of the resonance setting.

for quick example, if you want to kick up the low freq's in a track, set the resonance to max and gradually sweep the HPF up till the subwoofers start farting uncontrollably. then back off the resonance to the desired bass emphasis. in practice you'll get a feel for how far you can go without causing undesirable peaks.

or if you're looking for mid emphasis tune one or both filters to the bandwidth you're looking to highlight, then adjust the resonance to zoom in. you can do interesting things by overlapping the filters (or create silence) and stacking the two multimode filters on top of the filter mode eq on the channels offers some great options. for instance, you can bring down the highs on channels 1-3 by assigning them to filter 1 in LPF, then release the highs on ch 4 via the filter eq.

getting into filter mode eq is the easy part. drop it in at the end of a phase, hold it for 4 beats and open it up on the 1 of the next measure. it enters as a bandpass filter, and when you release it to full frequency it makes musical sense...

getting out of filter mode into a standard eq is a bit trickier. usually best to mix out and switch or as proben suggested - use the matrix.

as i stated at the start of this, i'm always in filter mode. to me, it is the single most important feature of the mixer. it gives back as much as you put in.
Interesting.. Im going to try to mix with just this mode for a few hrs.. Interesting approach and not the answer i expected
Cliff Lohman
06.11.2011
ya, ur totally right about it not clipping - i didnt know that but I did notice that the red light never came on even though I thought I was coming close to clipping. Thats good to know and definitely helps.

Good to hear about the firmware update addressing this. Seems like these firmware updates pack alot of features. Is there any place to get news on A+H firmware updates? Or do they pretty much just release them and surprise the users?

Thanks for explaining the master output - I was a little confused why certain things didnt seem to impact the master signal.. ive been accustomed to the master vol knob impacting the meters with past mixers so i was a little stumped at first. Its starting to make sense now though and I have to say it has amazing sound. I have yet to be able to make it distort without trying very hard to do so. Under normal mixing conditions, it just doesnt distort even when going nuts with efx + filters.

since i love fiddling with things - i will most definitely hook it up to a serato box at some time in the near future and let u know my thoughts..

thnx for all the info as always!!



*****
Originally Posted by mix architekt
there is an up coming firmware release that will have input gain adjustments to further tune the trim's response. it is considered by some users to be very hot; same for the coax inputs.

the channel and master meters on the DB4 are not marked at 0dBFS, so anything that is not keeping the top red clip indicator solidly lit will not be clipping the mixer. even then it takes a lot to get it to clip - are you able to hear your mixes distorting at this point? i run my DB4 quite hard, as we do with the iLives, and the 92's for that matter.

also, please note that the mix output adjustment from the menu will not affect the master meter. the master meter is showing the total signal present on the master bus, which is the sum of what the channel faders are sending it.

the master output knob is a subtractive control. fully open it is not adding anything to the master bus, anything below that is reducing the output.

it's normal position in a gain optimized system would be fully opened, provided that all the interconnects from start to finish are balanced and level matched. in practice, this is not often the case and thus a subtractive level control is present in two places - master mix level and the internal adjustment.

if you need to turn down the output of the DB4 to cleanly interface with another component in your system, i'd suggest leaving the master mix level wide open and then using the internal adjustment. this will allow the full range of control over the master if you want to do wild modulations of the output of the dj mixer (just kidding :-) ) or more aptly - manage how much you're hitting everyone with through out the evening . perhaps you'll pull things back a bit at the start and then open it up for the peak time elements... many ways to handle dynamics...

anyway, gain management is a very dynamic thing. the summing of tracks is not linear as discussed on another thread in a bit more detail, and hopefully very soon there will be a firmware update to address this. don't hesitate to email direct if needed.

also, on the sound quality question about serato and such, there's always going to be compromise with any choice you roll with, but the most important element is that you choose a medium to work with that gives you joy, and makes your expression efficient and flowing. everything else is secondary to the vibe you create and the relationship you have with your kit.
Cliff Lohman
05.11.2011
Hi,

So I got my DB4 yesterday and been loving it for last 24 hours..

I noticed something weird about the VU meters tho.. it seems like line inputs (cdj900 in particular) kick ALOT of volume into the db4 and there seems to be no way to trim such that the VU meters dont clip all the time. Yes, you can assign a trim to the MIX setting but it doesnt appear to impact the VU meters.

If I play a track on cdj900 and I turn db4 trim knob ALL the way to the lowest point, the VU meter is still well above the 0 mark on the channel meter. So I then go to the MIX menu settings and apply a trim and you can hear an audible decrease but the VU meters stay the same. Point being that channels look like they are clipping when they really shouldnt be.

Any workaround for this? Anybody else notice this issue?

Thnx
Kevin
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by djproben
If there's an easy way to "map" the K2 to the DB4 functions the way you can map MIDI, the possibilities are endless! It would be great to be able to change various effect parameters or to pre-program a specific effect combo and setting to a button the way you can with traktor midi mapping. I wonder what mapping would look like for that though; is it something we'll be able to do on a computer screen somehow?

Even more interesting, if this kind of mapping is possible, would it be possible to respond to MIDI signals from another controller? Maybe that's pushing it but it would be really cool to control DB4 functions from a MIDIfighter....

I really like the rotary mixer option idea but not just for the volume knobs ... I actually really like the idea of using the channel faders as D/W knobs. One thing I really loved about the Ecler Evo 5 is the D/W crossfader which allows you to insert momentary effects and cut them off quickly on beat. I'm currently doing this using the effects on/off buttons and having the D/W knob turned up, but those buttons are a bit too stiff and clicky for that purpose.
Interesting thought.. keeping a ton of effect pre-sets would be sweet.. Or if u could start to do like super knob type stuff with multiple effects. It'll definitely be interesting to see whats in store with the link feature
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by ToS
When switching between EQ-knob modes, can't you just hold the button of the mode you are switching to and, while holding it down, tune the knobs to the desired position without the change in sound?
No because its a little silver switch (like the little pilot cockpit switches if u know wat i mean). so u have to flip the switch.

Its not like the efx latching buttons where u can hold it down to not engage it. Of course, u can do that with the 2 seperate filters on the bottom (but not the filter by the iso/eq section).
Danae Dumler
23.11.2011
If there's an easy way to "map" the K2 to the DB4 functions the way you can map MIDI, the possibilities are endless! It would be great to be able to change various effect parameters or to pre-program a specific effect combo and setting to a button the way you can with traktor midi mapping. I wonder what mapping would look like for that though; is it something we'll be able to do on a computer screen somehow?

Even more interesting, if this kind of mapping is possible, would it be possible to respond to MIDI signals from another controller? Maybe that's pushing it but it would be really cool to control DB4 functions from a MIDIfighter....

I really like the rotary mixer option idea but not just for the volume knobs ... I actually really like the idea of using the channel faders as D/W knobs. One thing I really loved about the Ecler Evo 5 is the D/W crossfader which allows you to insert momentary effects and cut them off quickly on beat. I'm currently doing this using the effects on/off buttons and having the D/W knob turned up, but those buttons are a bit too stiff and clicky for that purpose.
Romelia Stankard
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
one thing i forgot to mention, is that with 4 tracks running at the same time, you're up against a lot of information and a horrible amount of sonic density. working with the filter eq allows for precise subtractive filtering, or graceful boosts to just the sections you need. as such, you can fit multiple tunes together in a way that they don't compete against each other. it also lends itself to very effective swapping of bass lines or percussion parts, etc... just honing the techniques of resonance and filter freq relationships.

"sculpting" is the word i always gravitate toward; it's quite literal too - the individual tracks are like big pieces of stone that you can whittle down, smooth out, and shape to just the essentials via the filter mode eq, with the end result being a flowing composition of marble, granite, amethyst, and fossilized dinosaur poops.

all of these fx suggestions are being meditated on and quite possible, it's just establishing priority and development resources to make it an actual reality. a product like K2 connected via xlink has potential for expanding control beyond the existing interface for such things.

as a side note, you can run effects into effects in a production context - using the pfl sends via the usb menu, you could configure ableton live to stack ch's 1-3 into 4 as your main output.

and to further dive into a production tangent, it's completely ridiculous and fun to use the DB4 as an effects processor for tracking. i have mine connected via spdif to my apogee ensemble, routed via an aux send in live, then play the DB4's effects over a drum buss via matrixed inputs. ch 1 is a hall reverb, ch 2 is a plate reverb that i only bring up on the 2 (first snare hit), then a emt250 on the 4 (second snare hit) and ch 4 for some other silly effect to bring in and out. from there i do finger sequencing, and play the effects with the track. i get tripped up a lot, but the mistakes add to the character of everything. totally worth giving it a try, as vst reverbs can't hold a candle to what's happening with dr rob's amazing reverb designs...
Man the possibilities here are crazy.

I sent in a firmware request ticket to A&H to make a firmware rotary mixer option that would swap the D/W knob on each channel with the linear fader, so the line fader becomes D/W and the big D/W knob becomes volume, do you believe this would be possible at some point?
Cliff Lohman
23.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
one thing i forgot to mention, is that with 4 tracks running at the same time, you're up against a lot of information and a horrible amount of sonic density. working with the filter eq allows for precise subtractive filtering, or graceful boosts to just the sections you need. as such, you can fit multiple tunes together in a way that they don't compete against each other. it also lends itself to very effective swapping of bass lines or percussion parts, etc... just honing the techniques of resonance and filter freq relationships.

"sculpting" is the word i always gravitate toward; it's quite literal too - the individual tracks are like big pieces of stone that you can whittle down, smooth out, and shape to just the essentials via the filter mode eq, with the end result being a flowing composition of marble, granite, amethyst, and fossilized dinosaur poops.

all of these fx suggestions are being meditated on and quite possible, it's just establishing priority and development resources to make it an actual reality. a product like K2 connected via xlink has potential for expanding control beyond the existing interface for such things.

as a side note, you can run effects into effects in a production context - using the pfl sends via the usb menu, you could configure ableton live to stack ch's 1-3 into 4 as your main output.

and to further dive into a production tangent, it's completely ridiculous and fun to use the DB4 as an effects processor for tracking. i have mine connected via spdif to my apogee ensemble, routed via an aux send in live, then play the DB4's effects over a drum buss via matrixed inputs. ch 1 is a hall reverb, ch 2 is a plate reverb that i only bring up on the 2 (first snare hit), then a emt250 on the 4 (second snare hit) and ch 4 for some other silly effect to bring in and out. from there i do finger sequencing, and play the effects with the track. i get tripped up a lot, but the mistakes add to the character of everything. totally worth giving it a try, as vst reverbs can't hold a candle to what's happening with dr rob's amazing reverb designs...
Thnx as always for ur encouraging tips..

Im curious as to an example of what the k2 might expand tho? I figured itd be nice and easy way to control more traktor midi functions (like the x1) but i wasnt believeing of it expanding db4 functions. Even if its a completely made up example - can u give one? Would it do something like - allow more efx paramter controls? Or give u more channels?
DJ MENSAH
23.11.2011
When switching between EQ-knob modes, can't you just hold the button of the mode you are switching to and, while holding it down, tune the knobs to the desired position without the change in sound?
Brant Briski
23.11.2011
one thing i forgot to mention, is that with 4 tracks running at the same time, you're up against a lot of information and a horrible amount of sonic density. working with the filter eq allows for precise subtractive filtering, or graceful boosts to just the sections you need. as such, you can fit multiple tunes together in a way that they don't compete against each other. it also lends itself to very effective swapping of bass lines or percussion parts, etc... just honing the techniques of resonance and filter freq relationships.

"sculpting" is the word i always gravitate toward; it's quite literal too - the individual tracks are like big pieces of stone that you can whittle down, smooth out, and shape to just the essentials via the filter mode eq, with the end result being a flowing composition of marble, granite, amethyst, and fossilized dinosaur poops.

all of these fx suggestions are being meditated on and quite possible, it's just establishing priority and development resources to make it an actual reality. a product like K2 connected via xlink has potential for expanding control beyond the existing interface for such things.

as a side note, you can run effects into effects in a production context - using the pfl sends via the usb menu, you could configure ableton live to stack ch's 1-3 into 4 as your main output.

and to further dive into a production tangent, it's completely ridiculous and fun to use the DB4 as an effects processor for tracking. i have mine connected via spdif to my apogee ensemble, routed via an aux send in live, then play the DB4's effects over a drum buss via matrixed inputs. ch 1 is a hall reverb, ch 2 is a plate reverb that i only bring up on the 2 (first snare hit), then a emt250 on the 4 (second snare hit) and ch 4 for some other silly effect to bring in and out. from there i do finger sequencing, and play the effects with the track. i get tripped up a lot, but the mistakes add to the character of everything. totally worth giving it a try, as vst reverbs can't hold a candle to what's happening with dr rob's amazing reverb designs...
Danae Dumler
23.11.2011
Wow yeah I'm still trying to get my head around everything you've said, and I've been using the filter mode a lot. I actually started playing like that on the Ecler Evo 5 in Traktor; I just mapped the knobs to control HP and LP and RES the way they do on the DB4 and played around with it; it was really a challenge just to mix in and out of songs that way and wound up just leaving the resonance at one setting and using the filters to mix in and out of songs. I will mix like this for a few days and see where it leads me; thanks for the explanation!

On another note I have a question about the effects ... believe theres any possibility a future firmware will offer a sort of effects matrix, where you can assign any effect processor to any channel (so you can combine more than one effect)?
Cliff Lohman
22.11.2011
Originally Posted by mix architekt
i only use filter mode and never touch the iso or eq unless i'm getting out of them.

filter mode is where the real magic of the mixer happens, it's just a different way of working from fixed frequency shelving filters, and the reward you get from learning how the resonance interacts with HPF/LPF results in amazingly coherent sculptures from multiple sources.

the offset of resonance is for ergonomic reasons. it allows easier access to either of the filter frequencies and resonance at the same time. it's important to work the resonance to get the most out of the filter mode itself.

at maximum resonance - it creates boost (quite a lot at times) relative to the filter frequencies... at minimum resonance it cuts, as the slope rolls off quite a bit. the idea is that you can use the filters to isolate the part of a track you want to emphasize, and how magnified or zoomed out you'll be is a byproduct of the resonance setting.

for quick example, if you want to kick up the low freq's in a track, set the resonance to max and gradually sweep the HPF up till the subwoofers start farting uncontrollably. then back off the resonance to the desired bass emphasis. in practice you'll get a feel for how far you can go without causing undesirable peaks.

or if you're looking for mid emphasis tune one or both filters to the bandwidth you're looking to highlight, then adjust the resonance to zoom in. you can do interesting things by overlapping the filters (or create silence) and stacking the two multimode filters on top of the filter mode eq on the channels offers some great options. for instance, you can bring down the highs on channels 1-3 by assigning them to filter 1 in LPF, then release the highs on ch 4 via the filter eq.

getting into filter mode eq is the easy part. drop it in at the end of a phase, hold it for 4 beats and open it up on the 1 of the next measure. it enters as a bandpass filter, and when you release it to full frequency it makes musical sense...

getting out of filter mode into a standard eq is a bit trickier. usually best to mix out and switch or as proben suggested - use the matrix.

as i stated at the start of this, i'm always in filter mode. to me, it is the single most important feature of the mixer. it gives back as much as you put in.
Interesting.. Im going to try to mix with just this mode for a few hrs.. Interesting approach and not the answer i expected
Brant Briski
22.11.2011
i only use filter mode and never touch the iso or eq unless i'm getting out of them.

filter mode is where the real magic of the mixer happens, it's just a different way of working from fixed frequency shelving filters, and the reward you get from learning how the resonance interacts with HPF/LPF results in amazingly coherent sculptures from multiple sources.

the offset of resonance is for ergonomic reasons. it allows easier access to either of the filter frequencies and resonance at the same time. it's important to work the resonance to get the most out of the filter mode itself.

at maximum resonance - it creates boost (quite a lot at times) relative to the filter frequencies... at minimum resonance it cuts, as the slope rolls off quite a bit. the idea is that you can use the filters to isolate the part of a track you want to emphasize, and how magnified or zoomed out you'll be is a byproduct of the resonance setting.

for quick example, if you want to kick up the low freq's in a track, set the resonance to max and gradually sweep the HPF up till the subwoofers start farting uncontrollably. then back off the resonance to the desired bass emphasis. in practice you'll get a feel for how far you can go without causing undesirable peaks.

or if you're looking for mid emphasis tune one or both filters to the bandwidth you're looking to highlight, then adjust the resonance to zoom in. you can do interesting things by overlapping the filters (or create silence) and stacking the two multimode filters on top of the filter mode eq on the channels offers some great options. for instance, you can bring down the highs on channels 1-3 by assigning them to filter 1 in LPF, then release the highs on ch 4 via the filter eq.

getting into filter mode eq is the easy part. drop it in at the end of a phase, hold it for 4 beats and open it up on the 1 of the next measure. it enters as a bandpass filter, and when you release it to full frequency it makes musical sense...

getting out of filter mode into a standard eq is a bit trickier. usually best to mix out and switch or as proben suggested - use the matrix.

as i stated at the start of this, i'm always in filter mode. to me, it is the single most important feature of the mixer. it gives back as much as you put in.
Cliff Lohman
14.11.2011
Good workaround.. Its taking me some time to get used to the interesting input matrix and sometimes i forget how flexible it can be.

But i get the sense this design was done intentionally.. I do find it can make some cool fast cuts of tracks in and out of the mix. But its tough to go smoothly from eq and filter on same channel. Mixarchitekt, whats the secret to the design? how do u go smoothly from eq to filter and back? Or do u just pick one and stick with it for a track?
Danae Dumler
13.11.2011
Yeah that's a problem with the way the EQ modes are selected. For now what I've been doing is when I want to use filter mode, send the same input to another channel and have the EQ knobs set up how I want them on that channel; then you can switch between channels without the sound changing and make your adjustments after that. But I wonder if there's a way to get at this in firmware so the different EQ/filter matrices are easier to move between.
Cliff Lohman
13.11.2011
Hey MixArchitekt,

Wondering if u could give me some background on why the top eq/filters/iso were laid out the way they were.. I definitely see creative possibilities but sometimes Im finding it tough to go back from filter to eq without a very abrupt change in sound. Any thoughts?

Thnx
Cliff Lohman
06.11.2011
ya, ur totally right about it not clipping - i didnt know that but I did notice that the red light never came on even though I thought I was coming close to clipping. Thats good to know and definitely helps.

Good to hear about the firmware update addressing this. Seems like these firmware updates pack alot of features. Is there any place to get news on A+H firmware updates? Or do they pretty much just release them and surprise the users?

Thanks for explaining the master output - I was a little confused why certain things didnt seem to impact the master signal.. ive been accustomed to the master vol knob impacting the meters with past mixers so i was a little stumped at first. Its starting to make sense now though and I have to say it has amazing sound. I have yet to be able to make it distort without trying very hard to do so. Under normal mixing conditions, it just doesnt distort even when going nuts with efx + filters.

since i love fiddling with things - i will most definitely hook it up to a serato box at some time in the near future and let u know my thoughts..

thnx for all the info as always!!



*****
Originally Posted by mix architekt
there is an up coming firmware release that will have input gain adjustments to further tune the trim's response. it is considered by some users to be very hot; same for the coax inputs.

the channel and master meters on the DB4 are not marked at 0dBFS, so anything that is not keeping the top red clip indicator solidly lit will not be clipping the mixer. even then it takes a lot to get it to clip - are you able to hear your mixes distorting at this point? i run my DB4 quite hard, as we do with the iLives, and the 92's for that matter.

also, please note that the mix output adjustment from the menu will not affect the master meter. the master meter is showing the total signal present on the master bus, which is the sum of what the channel faders are sending it.

the master output knob is a subtractive control. fully open it is not adding anything to the master bus, anything below that is reducing the output.

it's normal position in a gain optimized system would be fully opened, provided that all the interconnects from start to finish are balanced and level matched. in practice, this is not often the case and thus a subtractive level control is present in two places - master mix level and the internal adjustment.

if you need to turn down the output of the DB4 to cleanly interface with another component in your system, i'd suggest leaving the master mix level wide open and then using the internal adjustment. this will allow the full range of control over the master if you want to do wild modulations of the output of the dj mixer (just kidding :-) ) or more aptly - manage how much you're hitting everyone with through out the evening . perhaps you'll pull things back a bit at the start and then open it up for the peak time elements... many ways to handle dynamics...

anyway, gain management is a very dynamic thing. the summing of tracks is not linear as discussed on another thread in a bit more detail, and hopefully very soon there will be a firmware update to address this. don't hesitate to email direct if needed.

also, on the sound quality question about serato and such, there's always going to be compromise with any choice you roll with, but the most important element is that you choose a medium to work with that gives you joy, and makes your expression efficient and flowing. everything else is secondary to the vibe you create and the relationship you have with your kit.
Brant Briski
05.11.2011
there is an up coming firmware release that will have input gain adjustments to further tune the trim's response. it is considered by some users to be very hot; same for the coax inputs.

the channel and master meters on the DB4 are not marked at 0dBFS, so anything that is not keeping the top red clip indicator solidly lit will not be clipping the mixer. even then it takes a lot to get it to clip - are you able to hear your mixes distorting at this point? i run my DB4 quite hard, as we do with the iLives, and the 92's for that matter.

also, please note that the mix output adjustment from the menu will not affect the master meter. the master meter is showing the total signal present on the master bus, which is the sum of what the channel faders are sending it.

the master output knob is a subtractive control. fully open it is not adding anything to the master bus, anything below that is reducing the output.

it's normal position in a gain optimized system would be fully opened, provided that all the interconnects from start to finish are balanced and level matched. in practice, this is not often the case and thus a subtractive level control is present in two places - master mix level and the internal adjustment.

if you need to turn down the output of the DB4 to cleanly interface with another component in your system, i'd suggest leaving the master mix level wide open and then using the internal adjustment. this will allow the full range of control over the master if you want to do wild modulations of the output of the dj mixer (just kidding :-) ) or more aptly - manage how much you're hitting everyone with through out the evening . perhaps you'll pull things back a bit at the start and then open it up for the peak time elements... many ways to handle dynamics...

anyway, gain management is a very dynamic thing. the summing of tracks is not linear as discussed on another thread in a bit more detail, and hopefully very soon there will be a firmware update to address this. don't hesitate to email direct if needed.

also, on the sound quality question about serato and such, there's always going to be compromise with any choice you roll with, but the most important element is that you choose a medium to work with that gives you joy, and makes your expression efficient and flowing. everything else is secondary to the vibe you create and the relationship you have with your kit.

<< Back to Reviews of DJ equipment Reply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy