Am I the only one who hates notched encoders?
Am I the only one who hates notched encoders? Posted on: 10.08.2012 by Eloy Kiepke Really... Why do I keep seeing them on devices, when I see smooth, LED ring encoders on FAR cheaper stuff like behringer's new CMD line?Do people LIKE notched encoders? The only purpose I see for them is taking the place of a pair of up/down buttons and a "confirm" button. For changing values, they're just awful IMO. also, I believe push LED ring encoders need to take over for just about everything except EQ... those things are incredible. You can map ONE to as many different control layers as as you want, without the need for takeover when you switch layers. Plus you can map their push command to reset to default. AMAZING. EDIT: to avoid any newbie confusion, by notched encoders, I mean endless knobs that *click* when you turn them, I don't mean knobs with a center indent like most EQs etc. | |
Isa Erik 12.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by SirReal
|
Random X 11.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by synthet1c
There is only one Rotary Encoder Controller.... The Behringer BCR 2000! |
Latoria Kavulich 11.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by tekki
|
Celestine Porebski 10.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by sss18734
|
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by deevey
Why would we want to get used to acceleration, when smooth encoders can easily be turned at the exact speed as knobs, and arent much more expensive? |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by sss18734
Originally Posted by sss18734
Originally Posted by zimfella
|
Erica Charvet 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by Saurus
Isn't it common sense that you shouldnt map your notched encoder to a filter? Instead map it to loop size, browse functions, effects with set values, etc. I believe the gain adjust is fine. It keeps gain adjustments smooth and minor, as they should be. If you choose to map an effect onto them, you can make it as sensitive as you desire. |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by tekki
Originally Posted by ksandvik
Yes you can work around it just fine, just like you can play a great set on a pair of shitty CDJs and a cheap mixer if you have to. But when you're designing YOU OWN rig, you care about this stuff if you're serious about DJing. If you try to map effects to a notched encoder, you have to either set it so that you can either hear the notches as you turn up the effects, thus ruining a filter sweep etc. or so that you have to crank the knob around fifty times to get the effect all the way up. Ever used the gain knobs on the S4? Notice how much you have to turn those to just change the volume a noticeable amount? Imagine having to map an effect on to that where you need to go from zero to max... This stuff matters. |
Isa Erik 12.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by SirReal
|
Jonathan Chiuchiolo 11.08.2012 | nah it's all done in the middleware unfotunately, the novation zero has a midi mode but not the nocturn. If I was ever going to frankenstien a controller it would have the brain of the zero in it as it has just the right amount of analogue controls, heaps of digital and the mk2 has a midi lcd screen capable of displaying a lot of information. |
Diogo Dj Dragão 11.08.2012 | Is it not MIDI? |
Jonathan Chiuchiolo 11.08.2012 | I believe someone needs to crack the communication protocol of the nocturn so you get use of all the buttons and the touch sensitivity of the encoders, It's not HID and I could never find a software sniffer capable of intercepting the messages There was a project for linux on github using the nocturn though. |
Kiyoko Wellisch 12.08.2012 | The middleware of the Novation Nocturn blows everything out the water. If only it were on board firmware and not middleware. The Nocturn and the BCR2000 need to have a baby. |
Random X 11.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by synthet1c
There is only one Rotary Encoder Controller.... The Behringer BCR 2000! |
Celine Surico 11.08.2012 | Are you still debating about this thing? |
Jonathan Chiuchiolo 11.08.2012 | best encoders ever belong to novation nocturns... they have a very minor click when you turn, but the resolution is fantastic and they are incredibly modifiable in the editor so you have precise control over anything... The other huge thing is you can change them from virtual absolute to normal +/- encoder steps. Hopefully they get used on another novation controller in the future. But I love my nocturn! |
Latoria Kavulich 11.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by tekki
|
Celestine Porebski 10.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by sss18734
|
Germaine Bernadin 10.08.2012 | I find them sensual. |
Diogo Dj Dragão 10.08.2012 | There are REASONS why developers use things like encoders with detents. Sometimes these reasons are technical (like when the knob is meant to scroll through an ordered list), and sometimes they're more cultural (like English mixers using pots with detents so the pots can stop at measured values). In either case, it usually isn't a trivial decision. There's usually a good reason. |
Erica Charvet 09.08.2012 | How many controllers out there have mostly indented encoders? Just about everything I've seen has smooth encoders or a healthy combination of both. |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by deevey
Why would we want to get used to acceleration, when smooth encoders can easily be turned at the exact speed as knobs, and arent much more expensive? |
Hanna Ridenbaugh 09.08.2012 | |
Rolanda Clodfelder 09.08.2012 |
Ever used the gain knobs on the S4? Notice how much you have to turn those to just change the volume a noticeable amount? Imagine having to map an effect on to that where you need to go from zero to max...
|
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by sss18734
Originally Posted by sss18734
Originally Posted by zimfella
|
Hanna Ridenbaugh 09.08.2012 | lol did not realise who the op was, no offence. |
Erica Charvet 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by Saurus
Isn't it common sense that you shouldnt map your notched encoder to a filter? Instead map it to loop size, browse functions, effects with set values, etc. I believe the gain adjust is fine. It keeps gain adjustments smooth and minor, as they should be. If you choose to map an effect onto them, you can make it as sensitive as you desire. |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by tekki
Originally Posted by ksandvik
Yes you can work around it just fine, just like you can play a great set on a pair of shitty CDJs and a cheap mixer if you have to. But when you're designing YOU OWN rig, you care about this stuff if you're serious about DJing. If you try to map effects to a notched encoder, you have to either set it so that you can either hear the notches as you turn up the effects, thus ruining a filter sweep etc. or so that you have to crank the knob around fifty times to get the effect all the way up. Ever used the gain knobs on the S4? Notice how much you have to turn those to just change the volume a noticeable amount? Imagine having to map an effect on to that where you need to go from zero to max... This stuff matters. |
Random X 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by zimfella
|
Celine Surico 09.08.2012 |
Originally Posted by Saurus
|
Rey Holubar 09.08.2012 | Knotched encoders are good, if they are there were you need them, like on the S4 as gain knobs or the loop size and jump knobs. scamo |
Hanna Ridenbaugh 09.08.2012 | Can't stand them for effect use, fine for browsing library and loops size. |
Antonetta Wikel 09.08.2012 | I live with them on my 2 DNSC2000's, they work ok but non-notched would be much more prefereable. |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 | Nobody likes notched encoders enough that they'd buy systems specifically for them. |
Celine Surico 09.08.2012 | As with anything else on the market there's a reason some purchase systems based on notched encoders. |
Eloy Kiepke 09.08.2012 | <3 |
Rolanda Clodfelder 10.08.2012 | *edit* OP edited his post and my question became null and void. |
<< Back to Reviews of DJ equipment Reply