Opinions on FX?

Home :: General Discussion :: Opinions on FX?Reply
Opinions on FX?
Posted on: 18.06.2013 by Waldo Lessing
On popular songs i believe they're good because it shows you're doing something but not after that. What do you believe?
Augustine Mitzen
21.06.2013
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
I cannot believe of a single instance that a flanger sounds good on a track.

It is a guitar effect that should be used quite dry or with some added chorus to fatten the thinned out flanger. It is a beautiful guitar effect.

It sounds awful used by a DJ. (imho).
pretty much
Kristofer Krauel
21.06.2013
Originally Posted by Jester
I blame the big orange button on the djm600 and excessive red wine consumption
HAHA that orange button just begs to be pressed!! Ive been to a lot of house parties where 600's were being used and that button used to get hammered in flanger mode!!!
Elias Knapp
22.06.2013
If the crowd are really going crazy you can intensify build ups and fills with a little flourish of FX. But less is more.
Waldo Lessing
21.06.2013
cone to believe of it hardly anyones even gonna notice the effects unless it sounds bad
Waldo Lessing
21.06.2013
Wow I wasn't expecting so many answers, i believe its best to play it safe now thanks for the help!
Augustine Mitzen
21.06.2013
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
I cannot believe of a single instance that a flanger sounds good on a track.

It is a guitar effect that should be used quite dry or with some added chorus to fatten the thinned out flanger. It is a beautiful guitar effect.

It sounds awful used by a DJ. (imho).
pretty much
Latoria Kavulich
21.06.2013
guilty sir.
Kristofer Krauel
21.06.2013
Originally Posted by Jester
I blame the big orange button on the djm600 and excessive red wine consumption
HAHA that orange button just begs to be pressed!! Ive been to a lot of house parties where 600's were being used and that button used to get hammered in flanger mode!!!
Latoria Kavulich
21.06.2013
I blame the big orange button on the djm600 and excessive red wine consumption
nayit ruiz jaramillo
20.06.2013
I cannot believe of a single instance that a flanger sounds good on a track.

It is a guitar effect that should be used quite dry or with some added chorus to fatten the thinned out flanger. It is a beautiful guitar effect.

It sounds awful used by a DJ. (imho).
Doreen Schurle
20.06.2013
One of the clubs I work at as a photographer has a DJ who uses 900s and an 800, and 2-3 times in EVERY song he uses the flanger. Makes me cringe every time :@
Yong Aptekar
20.06.2013
Aside from my livingroom, I pretty much only play at house parties where other DJ friends are at. Depending on what's being played, fx get used or not. If its dnb, its all about clean long mixes. If its house or dubstep or something more "electronic", fx get used. Not a lot, and not many types.
Federico Vilas
20.06.2013
I'm horrible on the mic...so I always have a good hype man...but I just dont stand up and DJ... I dance and get into the music just like the crowd
Oretha Afful
20.06.2013
I believe the "just standing there" thing is the fault of festivals and huge shows. I have no problem playing 12-15 tracks an hour and letting a mix breath when I'm playing a weekly or a small show. Put me on stage in front of 3000 or more people and just standing there really doesn't cut it. You have thousands of people watching you and if you just stand there you can suck the energy out of the stage.
Still no reason to overdo the FX or play 50 tracks in an hour, just saying its' a whole different ballgame when you have 10K teeny bopper ravers with ADD you need to entertain and/or babysit. They want you to something even if it's as cheesy as pretending to use a filter. lol
Augustine Mitzen
20.06.2013
Don't forget starter gun fi dem gun shots
Kristofer Krauel
20.06.2013
Originally Posted by backtothefront
Just catching up with this thread, I'm definitely in the 12-15 tracks an hour camp with subtle, careful use of FX throughout. I'm mainly working the EQ's and a little bit of filtering, trying to be as smooth as possible in the transition, getting the phrasing spot on etc etc.

My main style is Soulful & Deep House, along with some Breaks. The Soulful/Deep House, in the main, would sound awful and disjointed if you were mixing in/out every minute or so, it would just not flow at all. As has been said, producers have spent a long time putting these tracks together, to sound like they do for a reason; IMHO I tend to use this as a basis and work the tracks together in different ways whilst maintaining the general intention of the producer.

Of course it is very much each to his own and a lot depends on the genre of music, club setting etc, but to say it's lazy for not using more than 30 tracks in an hour is IMHO is ignorant. Some of the 10 mins mixes I've viewed/listened to, tearing through the tracks, lots of fx can sound good and done well I can fully appreciate. But I wouldn't want to be subjected to that for 6 hours on on evening out at a darkened, underground club. For me I want to become lost in the groove, I'm not interested in seeing the DJ raised up high, big flashing lights and fist pumping and all the showy side at the often detriment to the music itself.

Again we all have our own opinions and views and it's good we do, it would be dull otherwise, however my experience over the years of the underground scene in the UK, many definitely prefer the low key, lost in the music as opposed to these 'EDM' shows which have cropped up in the last few years.
Good point, well made!!
Dannie Dimora
20.06.2013
Originally Posted by MaxOne
Imagine a film editor just making loads of edits and cuts and using loads of fx with the footage / rushes shot in the godfather 2...

Would that have made it a better film?
Tell that to Michael Bay
Lina Rawie
20.06.2013
I like FX, but only when they're used sparingly by an experienced DJ.

It's really not a good idea to use effects to "show people that you're doing something". Technicality in DJing is about skill, subtlety and using things like effects because of how they sound, not to effectively say "look guys, I'm not just standing here!" because there is nothing wrong with just standing there. Thinking otherwise often leads to you "over-seasoning the meal".
Hipolito Scionti
20.06.2013
Imagine a film editor just making loads of edits and cuts and using loads of fx with the footage / rushes shot in the godfather 2...

Would that have made it a better film?
Hanna Ridenbaugh
20.06.2013
Originally Posted by balakoth
We also just differ opinion. What you refer to mixing, to what I am questioning you on do not go hand in hand to me. You can mix any style you want.. But 12 songs.. its not really about you its about the crowd isnt it? There also isnt much "mixing" going on in an hour and 12 songs but again to each their own.

I just, wasnt sure based on all the past posts in this thread if you were being sarcastic or not. We dont have to like each others mixing style, but I surely am going to express what I may dislike :P Thats the beauty of a community or.. speech in general.
Fair do. That's why we're here to learn and enlighten ourselves.
Kecia Wnukowski
20.06.2013
... but what do you do for the 8-10 minutes that they're playing? Browse Facebook? Play Freecell? Fist pump?
I don't know, find other tracks and different artists rather than playing several times tracks from the same common cheesy obvious artistS in the same set?


Sarcasm aside, and back to the original question, it's all a matter of taste really, there are no rules but generally speaking: less is more/ it has to have a purpose and bring something/ nobody is right when it comes to a "form of art" (including myself as I tend to use fx quite a lot just especially in videos where if you don't show/do something it can be dull)/ we all can be guilty of cheesiness and make mistakes anyway
I believe what a lot of people are saying here is that:

musical selection> blending and EQ skills> technical skills (all the rest)


Nobody is jumping on the OP, it's a fair question, proof is the thread brought many different answers.
Latoria Kavulich
20.06.2013
well spoken mate
Lashawn Maycock
20.06.2013
Just catching up with this thread, I'm definitely in the 12-15 tracks an hour camp with subtle, careful use of FX throughout. I'm mainly working the EQ's and a little bit of filtering, trying to be as smooth as possible in the transition, getting the phrasing spot on etc etc.

My main style is Soulful & Deep House, along with some Breaks. The Soulful/Deep House, in the main, would sound awful and disjointed if you were mixing in/out every minute or so, it would just not flow at all. As has been said, producers have spent a long time putting these tracks together, to sound like they do for a reason; IMHO I tend to use this as a basis and work the tracks together in different ways whilst maintaining the general intention of the producer.

Of course it is very much each to his own and a lot depends on the genre of music, club setting etc, but to say it's lazy for not using more than 30 tracks in an hour is IMHO is ignorant. Some of the 10 mins mixes I've viewed/listened to, tearing through the tracks, lots of fx can sound good and done well I can fully appreciate. But I wouldn't want to be subjected to that for 6 hours on on evening out at a darkened, underground club. For me I want to become lost in the groove, I'm not interested in seeing the DJ raised up high, big flashing lights and fist pumping and all the showy side at the often detriment to the music itself.

Again we all have our own opinions and views and it's good we do, it would be dull otherwise, however my experience over the years of the underground scene in the UK, many definitely prefer the low key, lost in the music as opposed to these 'EDM' shows which have cropped up in the last few years.
Qiana Castellucci
20.06.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
That doesn't ACTUALLY answer the question though does it?

That long wait between tracks is EXACTLY the reason why I usually dislike mixing Top 40 stuff (mostly R&B and Indie, at least with Dance and Dubwank you can do dropmixes and mashups etc).
You don't get it do you? All i've heard you say is about how it would be boring for YOU and how YOU would find nothing to do between mixes. Its NOT ABOUT YOU! Its about the people who are supposed to be enjoying the music and dancing.

Have a look at the various live mixes on Mixcloud - pick pretty much any genre or DJ and you'll see they rarely get beyond 12-15 tracks per hour (unless is specifically a "mix as many as you can" kind of affair). But that doesn't mean that they aren't working the mix a lot of the time, flowing the tracks in and out, teasing phrases in and out, and (as other have said) prepping the next mix in and making sure everything is right FOR THE CROWD.

If all you're doing is mixing for your own entertainment, you may as well do it at home.
Latoria Kavulich
19.06.2013
On the mixer i use the ubiquitous phaser, flanger and filter sweep, and software wise i rock the effects on mine & tekki's Jammeister 3K for the Spectra. Very light on the effects over here, i go for the "less is more" approach. Never use them in recordings or on the show, however.
As koop mentions, i spend most of the time getting the levels right, phrasing sussed etc.
Kristofer Krauel
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
... but what do you do for the 8-10 minutes that they're playing? Browse Facebook? Play Freecell? Fist pump?
How about digging for your next track, cueing it up, checking the levels, finding your most suitable mix in point, testing your phrasing, listening to how the 3 EQ levels mix with the outgoing track so that you can truly blend them together. That and having a couple of swigs of my pint pretty much keep me busy enough. But hey thats just me.
Gaynell Rydberg
19.06.2013
Random question mdc, did you ever get around to making that video of you mixing on the Zomo?
Ara Tima
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by balakoth
I can't tell if you are trolling or not. What purpose do you serve as a DJ playing 12 tracks. Thats one CD of fully played songs. Im with MDC on this one. Proper cue point usage, and mixing technique, you can provide the full energy and essence, plus build up and drops if you want within 2 to 3 minutes, using the other part of the song to seamlessly transition.

There is no way Id ask you to come play at my club again if thats what you provided my patrons for an hour. Of course the UK and US are different. Its hard enough to not find an open format bottle service club now a days anyways.

You should give some tips to the likes of Sasha/Digweed/Hernan Cattaneo etc.. They must be baffled by the way they struggle to get work now all the FX kiddies are taking their jobs.

Seriously though. A lot depends on the genre of music.... 10-12 songs an hour is plenty in some genres...
Antonetta Wikel
19.06.2013
No, add up 12 10 minute tracks and you've got 120 minutes. That's 2 hours for a one hour mix, believe about it.
Doreen Schurle
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by Jester
he's letting the tunes express themselves, instead of stangling them
That doesn't ACTUALLY answer the question though does it?

That long wait between tracks is EXACTLY the reason why I usually dislike mixing Top 40 stuff (mostly R&B and Indie, at least with Dance and Dubwank you can do dropmixes and mashups etc).
Latoria Kavulich
19.06.2013
he's letting the tunes express themselves, instead of stangling them
Doreen Schurle
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by SirReal
Seriously, 12 tracks at 8-10 minutes each allows for a decent amount of mixing within an hour.
... but what do you do for the 8-10 minutes that they're playing? Browse Facebook? Play Freecell? Fist pump?
Antonetta Wikel
19.06.2013
Seriously, 12 tracks at 8-10 minutes each allows for a decent amount of mixing within an hour.
Latoria Kavulich
19.06.2013
In an hour, i would be using 12-13 tracks and mixing for about 20 minutes of that time.
Doreen Schurle
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by balakoth
There also isnt much "mixing" going on in an hour and 12 songs but again to each their own.
Unless you're playing a deep house evening , in which case all you really need (apparently) is a 30 second, 16-bar track cut up into four loops and repeated in varying sequences for 5 hours solid. With the occasional sample of a black woman (possibly a gospel singer)saying "awwww yeahhhhhhhhhhh" or something.
Shawn Vanhaitsma
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by zimfella
Just because i mix differently to you, I'm in the wrong? I use loops and efx sparingly to. But hey why should I justify myself. If we all mixed the same, then what?
We also just differ opinion. What you refer to mixing, to what I am questioning you on do not go hand in hand to me. You can mix any style you want.. But 12 songs.. its not really about you its about the crowd isnt it? There also isnt much "mixing" going on in an hour and 12 songs but again to each their own.

I just wasnt sure based on all the past posts in this thread if you were being sarcastic or not. We dont have to like each others mixing style, but I surely am going to express what I may dislike :P Thats the beauty of a community or.. speech in general.
Kristofer Krauel
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by tokenasianguy
A lot of fundamentals of DJ'ing (aside from turntablism), have more to do with nobody noticing you're doing anything. It's about all seamless mixing and subtlety. It's the same with effects, the better you blend it in, the less people will notice.
Agreed. Unless you've gone to specifically see a certain DJ, you shouldn't even know that they are there.

I believe this has a lot to do with the genre you play as well. Certain genres lend themselves to short "wall of sound" mixing and effects. Others seem to be more suited to subtle blends.
Darlene Strohbeck
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by dripstep
More the better! Layer em up, add some air horn to let everyone know this is a remix, drop in some serious flanger as well if you really wanna get the party bouncing.
This made me LOL.

Reminded me of my early DJ sets...And Paris Hilton's first DJ Set...
Hellen Mindrup
19.06.2013
Meh, only effects I use during my mixes are filters/flangers. Hell, you wouldn't even notice I was using effects through the majority of my set. I was super fx happy when I was learning on a DJM, then I realized that I was just acting a fool and made the music terrible.
Darlene Strohbeck
19.06.2013
Originally Posted by de4thbyc4ke
On popular songs i believe they're good because it shows you're doing something but not after that. What do you believe?
A lot of fundamentals of DJ'ing (aside from turntablism), have more to do with nobody noticing you're doing anything. It's about all seamless mixing and subtlety. It's the same with effects, the better you blend it in, the less people will notice.

<< Back to General DiscussionReply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy