Opinions on FX?
Opinions on FX? Posted on: 18.06.2013 by Waldo Lessing On popular songs i believe they're good because it shows you're doing something but not after that. What do you believe? | |
Augustine Mitzen 21.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
|
Kristofer Krauel 21.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by Jester
|
Elias Knapp 22.06.2013 | If the crowd are really going crazy you can intensify build ups and fills with a little flourish of FX. But less is more. |
Waldo Lessing 21.06.2013 | cone to believe of it hardly anyones even gonna notice the effects unless it sounds bad |
Waldo Lessing 21.06.2013 | Wow I wasn't expecting so many answers, i believe its best to play it safe now thanks for the help! |
Augustine Mitzen 21.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
|
Latoria Kavulich 21.06.2013 | guilty sir. |
Kristofer Krauel 21.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by Jester
|
Latoria Kavulich 21.06.2013 | I blame the big orange button on the djm600 and excessive red wine consumption |
nayit ruiz jaramillo 20.06.2013 | I cannot believe of a single instance that a flanger sounds good on a track. It is a guitar effect that should be used quite dry or with some added chorus to fatten the thinned out flanger. It is a beautiful guitar effect. It sounds awful used by a DJ. (imho). |
Doreen Schurle 20.06.2013 | One of the clubs I work at as a photographer has a DJ who uses 900s and an 800, and 2-3 times in EVERY song he uses the flanger. Makes me cringe every time :@ |
Yong Aptekar 20.06.2013 | Aside from my livingroom, I pretty much only play at house parties where other DJ friends are at. Depending on what's being played, fx get used or not. If its dnb, its all about clean long mixes. If its house or dubstep or something more "electronic", fx get used. Not a lot, and not many types. |
Federico Vilas 20.06.2013 | I'm horrible on the mic...so I always have a good hype man...but I just dont stand up and DJ... I dance and get into the music just like the crowd |
Oretha Afful 20.06.2013 | I believe the "just standing there" thing is the fault of festivals and huge shows. I have no problem playing 12-15 tracks an hour and letting a mix breath when I'm playing a weekly or a small show. Put me on stage in front of 3000 or more people and just standing there really doesn't cut it. You have thousands of people watching you and if you just stand there you can suck the energy out of the stage. Still no reason to overdo the FX or play 50 tracks in an hour, just saying its' a whole different ballgame when you have 10K teeny bopper ravers with ADD you need to entertain and/or babysit. They want you to something even if it's as cheesy as pretending to use a filter. lol |
Augustine Mitzen 20.06.2013 | Don't forget starter gun fi dem gun shots |
Kristofer Krauel 20.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by backtothefront
|
Dannie Dimora 20.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by MaxOne
|
Lina Rawie 20.06.2013 | I like FX, but only when they're used sparingly by an experienced DJ. It's really not a good idea to use effects to "show people that you're doing something". Technicality in DJing is about skill, subtlety and using things like effects because of how they sound, not to effectively say "look guys, I'm not just standing here!" because there is nothing wrong with just standing there. Thinking otherwise often leads to you "over-seasoning the meal". |
Hipolito Scionti 20.06.2013 | Imagine a film editor just making loads of edits and cuts and using loads of fx with the footage / rushes shot in the godfather 2... Would that have made it a better film? |
Hanna Ridenbaugh 20.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by balakoth
|
Kecia Wnukowski 20.06.2013 |
... but what do you do for the 8-10 minutes that they're playing? Browse Facebook? Play Freecell? Fist pump?
Sarcasm aside, and back to the original question, it's all a matter of taste really, there are no rules but generally speaking: less is more/ it has to have a purpose and bring something/ nobody is right when it comes to a "form of art" (including myself as I tend to use fx quite a lot just especially in videos where if you don't show/do something it can be dull)/ we all can be guilty of cheesiness and make mistakes anyway I believe what a lot of people are saying here is that: musical selection> blending and EQ skills> technical skills (all the rest) Nobody is jumping on the OP, it's a fair question, proof is the thread brought many different answers. |
Latoria Kavulich 20.06.2013 | well spoken mate |
Lashawn Maycock 20.06.2013 | Just catching up with this thread, I'm definitely in the 12-15 tracks an hour camp with subtle, careful use of FX throughout. I'm mainly working the EQ's and a little bit of filtering, trying to be as smooth as possible in the transition, getting the phrasing spot on etc etc. My main style is Soulful & Deep House, along with some Breaks. The Soulful/Deep House, in the main, would sound awful and disjointed if you were mixing in/out every minute or so, it would just not flow at all. As has been said, producers have spent a long time putting these tracks together, to sound like they do for a reason; IMHO I tend to use this as a basis and work the tracks together in different ways whilst maintaining the general intention of the producer. Of course it is very much each to his own and a lot depends on the genre of music, club setting etc, but to say it's lazy for not using more than 30 tracks in an hour is IMHO is ignorant. Some of the 10 mins mixes I've viewed/listened to, tearing through the tracks, lots of fx can sound good and done well I can fully appreciate. But I wouldn't want to be subjected to that for 6 hours on on evening out at a darkened, underground club. For me I want to become lost in the groove, I'm not interested in seeing the DJ raised up high, big flashing lights and fist pumping and all the showy side at the often detriment to the music itself. Again we all have our own opinions and views and it's good we do, it would be dull otherwise, however my experience over the years of the underground scene in the UK, many definitely prefer the low key, lost in the music as opposed to these 'EDM' shows which have cropped up in the last few years. |
Qiana Castellucci 20.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
Have a look at the various live mixes on Mixcloud - pick pretty much any genre or DJ and you'll see they rarely get beyond 12-15 tracks per hour (unless is specifically a "mix as many as you can" kind of affair). But that doesn't mean that they aren't working the mix a lot of the time, flowing the tracks in and out, teasing phrases in and out, and (as other have said) prepping the next mix in and making sure everything is right FOR THE CROWD. If all you're doing is mixing for your own entertainment, you may as well do it at home. |
Latoria Kavulich 19.06.2013 | On the mixer i use the ubiquitous phaser, flanger and filter sweep, and software wise i rock the effects on mine & tekki's Jammeister 3K for the Spectra. Very light on the effects over here, i go for the "less is more" approach. Never use them in recordings or on the show, however. As koop mentions, i spend most of the time getting the levels right, phrasing sussed etc. |
Kristofer Krauel 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by mdcdesign
|
Gaynell Rydberg 19.06.2013 | Random question mdc, did you ever get around to making that video of you mixing on the Zomo? |
Ara Tima 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by balakoth
You should give some tips to the likes of Sasha/Digweed/Hernan Cattaneo etc.. They must be baffled by the way they struggle to get work now all the FX kiddies are taking their jobs. Seriously though. A lot depends on the genre of music.... 10-12 songs an hour is plenty in some genres... |
Antonetta Wikel 19.06.2013 | No, add up 12 10 minute tracks and you've got 120 minutes. That's 2 hours for a one hour mix, believe about it. |
Doreen Schurle 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by Jester
That long wait between tracks is EXACTLY the reason why I usually dislike mixing Top 40 stuff (mostly R&B and Indie, at least with Dance and Dubwank you can do dropmixes and mashups etc). |
Latoria Kavulich 19.06.2013 | he's letting the tunes express themselves, instead of stangling them |
Doreen Schurle 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by SirReal
|
Antonetta Wikel 19.06.2013 | Seriously, 12 tracks at 8-10 minutes each allows for a decent amount of mixing within an hour. |
Latoria Kavulich 19.06.2013 | In an hour, i would be using 12-13 tracks and mixing for about 20 minutes of that time. |
Doreen Schurle 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by balakoth
|
Shawn Vanhaitsma 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by zimfella
I just wasnt sure based on all the past posts in this thread if you were being sarcastic or not. We dont have to like each others mixing style, but I surely am going to express what I may dislike :P Thats the beauty of a community or.. speech in general. |
Kristofer Krauel 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by tokenasianguy
I believe this has a lot to do with the genre you play as well. Certain genres lend themselves to short "wall of sound" mixing and effects. Others seem to be more suited to subtle blends. |
Darlene Strohbeck 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by dripstep
Reminded me of my early DJ sets...And Paris Hilton's first DJ Set... |
Hellen Mindrup 19.06.2013 | Meh, only effects I use during my mixes are filters/flangers. Hell, you wouldn't even notice I was using effects through the majority of my set. I was super fx happy when I was learning on a DJM, then I realized that I was just acting a fool and made the music terrible. |
Darlene Strohbeck 19.06.2013 |
Originally Posted by de4thbyc4ke
|
<< Back to General DiscussionReply