Audio-Technica LP120-USB

Home :: Oldschool - vinyl and disc Djs topic :: Audio-Technica LP120-USBReply
Audio-Technica LP120-USB
Posted on: 19.02.2012 by Rose Narra
http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/tu...772/index.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6rTNZouTOE



Discuss...
Danae Dumler
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by rgtb
it's .2%, not .02%. and if my suspicion is right (i.e., internally, the AT is very similar to the Numark TT200), then the 50dB S/N is a weighted figure. but, for the technics, 56dB is unweighted, the corresponding weighted figure is 78 dB (iirc).
Ahh you're right about the .2%. Pretty damn sure you can't hear that difference though either way.
Ngan Ernestine
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
I was comparing the Audio Technica (.02% W+F and 50db S/N) with the 1200 M5G (.01% and 56db)
it's .2%, not .02%. and if my suspicion is right (i.e., internally, the AT is very similar to the Numark TT200), then the 50dB S/N is a weighted figure. but, for the technics, 56dB is unweighted, the corresponding weighted figure is 78 dB (iirc).
Francene Cafaro
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
I was comparing the Audio Technica (.02% W+F and 50db S/N) with the 1200 M5G (.01% and 56db)
Ahh ok.
Francene Cafaro
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
The specs look comparable to me, the differences (.01% and 6db) are practically a rounding error.
For which table? An LP120 or an TT200 or an SL-1200?
Danae Dumler
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by rgtb
it really looks like a technics. but inside, it's similar to a numark tt200. specs for wow and flutter and rumble aren't impressive at all. guy in youtube vid is a bit dumb?
The specs look comparable to me, the differences (.01% and 6db) are practically a rounding error.
Earleen Alpine
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by djlotus
I like having the 78 on there. I truly miss that from my Numarks. I would be interested to see tracking and antiskate in action.
Really? :O I spin a pair of TTX-1s and the 78rpm button has always baffled me. What have you used it for?
Rose Narra
19.02.2012		http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/tu...772/index.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6rTNZouTOE



Discuss...
Monty Strauder
20.02.2012		Hey Guys, i got two of them, but i cant say anything. this are my first turntables and i never played before with other turntables ;-(
Danae Dumler
20.02.2012		btw there is an interesting post here on this topic - http://www.discogs.com/groups/topic/155536 - which suggests the W+F figures for the AT turntable are likely more similar to the Technics than they appear.
Danae Dumler
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by rgtb
it's .2%, not .02%. and if my suspicion is right (i.e., internally, the AT is very similar to the Numark TT200), then the 50dB S/N is a weighted figure. but, for the technics, 56dB is unweighted, the corresponding weighted figure is 78 dB (iirc).
Ahh you're right about the .2%. Pretty damn sure you can't hear that difference though either way.
Ngan Ernestine
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
I was comparing the Audio Technica (.02% W+F and 50db S/N) with the 1200 M5G (.01% and 56db)
it's .2%, not .02%. and if my suspicion is right (i.e., internally, the AT is very similar to the Numark TT200), then the 50dB S/N is a weighted figure. but, for the technics, 56dB is unweighted, the corresponding weighted figure is 78 dB (iirc).
Francene Cafaro
20.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
I was comparing the Audio Technica (.02% W+F and 50db S/N) with the 1200 M5G (.01% and 56db)
Ahh ok.
Danae Dumler
19.02.2012		I was comparing the Audio Technica (.02% W+F and 50db S/N) with the 1200 M5G (.01% and 56db)
Francene Cafaro
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by djproben
The specs look comparable to me, the differences (.01% and 6db) are practically a rounding error.
For which table? An LP120 or an TT200 or an SL-1200?
Danae Dumler
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by rgtb
it really looks like a technics. but inside, it's similar to a numark tt200. specs for wow and flutter and rumble aren't impressive at all. guy in youtube vid is a bit dumb?
The specs look comparable to me, the differences (.01% and 6db) are practically a rounding error.
Ira Alsadi
19.02.2012		I have tons of old broadcast and classical and some swing recorded at 78.
Earleen Alpine
19.02.2012
Originally Posted by djlotus
I like having the 78 on there. I truly miss that from my Numarks. I would be interested to see tracking and antiskate in action.
Really? :O I spin a pair of TTX-1s and the 78rpm button has always baffled me. What have you used it for?
Ngan Ernestine
19.02.2012		it really looks like a technics. but inside, it's similar to a numark tt200. specs for wow and flutter and rumble aren't impressive at all. guy in youtube vid is a bit dumb?
Ira Alsadi
19.02.2012		I like having the 78 on there. I truly miss that from my Numarks. I would be interested to see tracking and antiskate in action.
Danae Dumler
19.02.2012		I played with one of these at CES. It's truly badass. Feels just like it should; not exactly like Technics but the power + weight are all there. And Audio-Technica is no slouch; they have very well respected lines of phono cartridges and headphones. They don't have a history of making stuff marketed to DJs, but let's face it, we're not brain surgeons; our needs are pretty obvious and identifiable. If you're looking for new decks I would totally recommend these.
Francene Cafaro
19.02.2012		Cool!

<< Back to Oldschool - vinyl and disc Djs topicReply

Copyright 2012-2023
DJRANKINGS.ORG n.g.o.
Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan

Created by Ajaxel CMS

Terms & Privacy