How to force Traktor to reanalyze
How to force Traktor to reanalyze Posted on: 27.05.2013 by Arlette Herubin Let's imagine this scenario. I have a track named A that is imported into Traktor 2.5 library. It is too quiet, so I normalize it using some other tool. Now I right click on it in Traktor and select Analyze(Async), then press ok in the Analyze dialog pop-up...I can tell that Traktor does not re-analyze the track because it it still shows the quieter waveform. So I delete the track from the collection then re-import it. Still, when I put the track into a deck it shows the old waveform.So this is where I need you, guys. Can somebody tell me if there is a way for force Traktor to re-analize tracks and re-create the waveform? Thanks. | |
| Nedra Fresneda 27.05.2013 | |
| Arlette Herubin 27.05.2013 | Let's imagine this scenario. I have a track named A that is imported into Traktor 2.5 library. It is too quiet, so I normalize it using some other tool. Now I right click on it in Traktor and select Analyze(Async), then press ok in the Analyze dialog pop-up...I can tell that Traktor does not re-analyze the track because it it still shows the quieter waveform. So I delete the track from the collection then re-import it. Still, when I put the track into a deck it shows the old waveform. So this is where I need you, guys. Can somebody tell me if there is a way for force Traktor to re-analize tracks and re-create the waveform? Thanks. |
| Nedra Fresneda 29.05.2013 | Try opening the file with kid3 and strip it from all tags, then reimport to traktor. As a last resort look inside the your Traktor folder for one called "stripes". now find the subfolder that matches the original import date of that track and delete it (pointing the exact one tied to that file is a pain). |
| Kellie Myrum 29.05.2013 | Normalize probably didn't overwrite your MP3 tag. Traktor collection save file as a backup. |
| Arlette Herubin 28.05.2013 | You, guys, are totally focusing on the wrong part of the question. Normalization was just an example. The question applies to any sort of in-place modification of the audio data. Let's say I have a file that has 10 minutes of silence after the actual track and I want to get rid of it. But I spent half hour placing que points and don't want that work to go to waste. <offtopic> But if I were to normalize an audio file, I'd use sox. It's a command-line utility that can do all kinds of neat stuff with audio files. </offtocpic> |
| Emelina Chillson 28.05.2013 | Whya re your tracks so quiet to begin with? |
| Latoria Kavulich 28.05.2013 | what do you use to "normalise" your tracks? |
| Arlette Herubin 27.05.2013 | padi_04, one would believe that it would do the trick. Just like one would thing selecting "analyze" would re-analyze. But neither is the case in my experience. |
| Nedra Fresneda 27.05.2013 | |
<< Back to General DiscussionReply